BloFin review: a low-fee, derivatives-first exchange with optional KYC and a published reserve proof, but no major licence, a murky legal entity and weak customer ratings.
Twenty-sixth in our Crypto Centralized Exchanges series. BloFin, founded in 2019, charges a flat 0.10% on spot and 0.02% / 0.06% on futures, offers perpetuals up to 150x and copy trading, and publishes a Merkle-tree Proof of Reserves with ratios above 100% in May 2026 (company-reported). We found no publicly reported hack. It holds no licence from a major regulator, sources disagree on its legal entity, no reserve auditor is named, Trustpilot shows about 1.9 out of 5 on a small sample, and the US and Canada are excluded. We weighted all of it.
Our take, up front: BloFin, founded in 2019, is a derivatives-first offshore exchange with a flat 0.10% spot fee, 0.02% / 0.06% base futures fees, perpetuals up to 150x, copy trading and optional KYC. We found no publicly reported hack, and its Merkle-tree Proof of Reserves showed ratios above 100% in May 2026 (company-reported). The weaknesses are plain: no licence from a major regulator, conflicting information about its legal entity, no named reserve auditor, a Trustpilot score near 1.9 out of 5 on a small sample, and the exclusion of the US and Canada. We score it 51, twenty-fourth of twenty-six: just behind Bitrue and ahead of LBank.
BloFin’s security case is a clean public record plus a self-published reserve proof, with little independent verification of either. We found no publicly reported breach since the exchange launched in 2019 (Cryptonomist, August 2026), and CoinGecko’s data provider cer.live listed no incidents as of May 5, 2026. That counts for something in a year when Binance, Bitget, Phemex and BingX were all hit, but an absence of reports is not proof of strong controls. BloFin says it keeps a 1:1 reserve backed by a Merkle-tree Proof of Reserves that each user can check against their own balance, tracked through Nansen. Its Academy page, dated May 20, 2026, gives ratios as of May 15, 2026 of 105.77% for USDT, 149.67% for BTC and 162.97% for ETH, all company-reported. No third-party auditor is named, the update cadence is described as continuous by BloFin and bi-monthly by a comparison site, and BloFin’s own security page says the cold-versus-hot wallet split is not disclosed. Custody runs through Fireblocks MPC, and third-party summaries cite ISO 27001, PCI DSS (September 2025) and Chainalysis screening; the insurance cover some reviewers mention is unverified. Account protection includes an authenticator, passkeys, email codes and an anti-phishing code, and BloFin has issued repeated warnings about look-alike sites.
Pros
- No publicly reported breach since 2019; cer.live lists no incidents (May 2026)
- Merkle-tree Proof of Reserves above 100% (company-reported, May 15, 2026) and Fireblocks MPC custody
Cons
- No named third-party auditor; hot-versus-cold wallet split not disclosed
- Reserve cadence and insurance claims differ between sources and are unverified
BloFin holds no licence from a major regulator, and even its legal home is unclear. Sources name different jurisdictions: Cryptonomist says it is registered in the Cayman Islands, the comparison site CoinPerps says it operates through BuildLight Future Limited in the Marshall Islands, BloFin’s press releases are datelined Road Town, British Virgin Islands, and DataWallet describes a Singapore business registration without a Singapore payment licence. DataWallet’s review page claims a US FinCEN registration and a Cayman CIMA fund licence, yet its own restricted-countries page says BloFin has no active MSB status, and CoinPerps reports that neither appears on any registry, so we treat both claims as unverified. A press-release claim of a MAS-linked registration and Korean VASP membership is likewise unconfirmed. The US and Canada are excluded, more than 40 jurisdictions are blocked in total, and the terms let BloFin extend the list at its discretion. KYC is optional for basic use, which helps privacy but means weaker oversight and more exposure if rules change. In the sources we reviewed we found no regulator enforcement action, though we could not check every national register.
Pros
- No regulator enforcement action found in the sources we reviewed
- Excludes the US and Canada and reportedly screens transactions with Chainalysis
Cons
- No licence from a major regulator; entity jurisdiction differs by source
- FinCEN, CIMA and MAS-linked claims could not be verified
BloFin’s fees are low and easy to understand, though the base futures taker rate is not the cheapest. Spot is a flat 0.10% maker and taker (Cryptonomist, CryptoWinRate, BeInCrypto). Perpetual futures start at 0.020% maker and 0.060% taker. At VIP 1, which Cryptonomist says needs $50,000 in account assets and no trading volume, they fall to 0.006% maker and 0.050% taker, and CryptoWinRate says the top tiers reach 0% maker and 0.035% taker. Traders Union reports zero-maker promotions on new perpetual pairs. Cryptonomist calls the regular 0.060% taker high unless you reach VIP 1. One source quotes a 0.10% starting fee for perpetuals, which conflicts with the others, and we could not find a reliable withdrawal fee schedule. BloFin has no direct fiat deposits (FXEmpire), so card and gateway purchases carry third-party costs.
Pros
- 0.10% spot and 0.02% / 0.06% futures at the base tier
- VIP 1 reportedly needs only $50,000 in assets, with lower rates
Cons
- 0.06% base futures taker is high until VIP 1; one source conflicts on perpetual fees
- Withdrawal fees not found; no direct fiat deposits
BloFin is derivatives-first. Traders Union describes 300+ USDT-margined perpetual contracts, while Cryptonews counts 530+ futures pairs and 430+ spot pairs and TradingFinder lists about 500 coins, so the figure is unreconciled. Cryptonomist notes that perpetuals can be USDT-, USDC- or coin-margined, with cross, isolated and portfolio margin, and leverage reaches 150x on top pairs such as BTC and ETH. In August 2026 BloFin said 24/7 tokenized trading covered more than 75 perpetual markets and 13 tokenized spot markets (via Traders Union). Spot is narrower than at the largest exchanges, there is no spot margin, and FXEmpire notes the lack of direct fiat deposits. Copy trading, demo trading, API and webhook trading are all included, and BloFin cut deposit and withdrawal support for some tokens on certain networks on January 16, 2026.
Pros
- 300+ to 530+ perpetual contracts (counts differ) and up to 150x on top pairs
- Copy trading, demo trading, API and 24/7 tokenized markets
Cons
- Spot list narrower than the biggest exchanges; no spot margin
- No direct fiat deposits; coin and pair counts conflict by source
Onboarding is the draw. KYC is optional for basic trading, with a reported 20,000 USDT daily withdrawal cap for unverified accounts and higher caps at Level 1 and Level 2 (CoinPerps, a comparison site; we could not confirm the limits on BloFin’s own pages). The platform includes demo trading, API and webhook support, a copy-trading hub and automated risk controls for copy trading. Experience ratings are uneven: FXEmpire’s review, updated August 19, 2025, scored it 3.8 out of 5 overall but only 2.1 for trading experience and 1.9 for deposits and withdrawals. Cryptonomist says liquidity and open interest are thinner than at the largest exchanges, so large market orders can slip. An EEA-only card linked to Mastercard is reported by CoinPerps.
Pros
- Optional KYC and quick sign-up; demo account, API and webhooks
- Copy trading with automated risk-control tools
Cons
- FXEmpire gave 1.9 out of 5 for deposits and withdrawals (updated Aug 2025)
- Thinner liquidity than the largest exchanges; limits are third-party-sourced
Customer feedback is poor. TradingFinder reports 68 Trustpilot reviews and a TrustScore of 1.9 out of 5, with 77% one- or two-star and 19% five-star, and says BloFin replied to 97% of negative reviews; the complaints centre on poor support, account closures and alleged market manipulation. We could not load the Trustpilot page itself, so these figures come from a comparison site and may be dated, and a small review base is easily swayed. FXEmpire’s separate scores show similar weakness on deposits and withdrawals. BloFin runs a help centre and publishes impersonation warnings about clone sites such as “BloFinex,” where users reported failed withdrawals, but we found no published response-time commitment.
Pros
- Replies to 97% of negative Trustpilot reviews (as reported)
- Help centre with published scam and impersonation warnings
Cons
- Trustpilot about 1.9 out of 5; 77% one- or two-star on 68 reviews (via TradingFinder)
- Complaints about account closures and withdrawals; no response-time commitment found
BloFin has no native token, so its extras are product-based rather than token-based. Copy trading covers spot and futures, with lead traders earning a 10% profit share that can rise to 20% for eligible traders, and a leaderboard showing Sharpe, Sortino and Calmar ratios (Cryptonomist). BloFin Earn offers flexible and 2-to-180-day fixed products, with flexible USDT quoted around 3.5%, plus RWUSD, a principal-protected product benchmarked to real-world-asset yields; yields change and these figures come from the review. The exchange also runs large promotions such as the $5M War of Whales 2026 contest and title sponsorship of TOKEN2049 Singapore in 2026, both announced in sponsored press releases. We did not find a launchpad, native chain or wallet ecosystem comparable to the larger exchanges.
Pros
- Spot and futures copy trading with a transparent leaderboard
- Earn and RWUSD products; no native-token dependence
Cons
- No launchpad, wallet or native chain found
- Yields and contests are company-promoted; APYs change
A low-fee, derivatives-first exchange with optional KYC and copy trading, but weigh the missing major licence, the unclear legal entity and the weak customer ratings.
BloFin suits experienced derivatives traders outside restricted regions who want low fees, high leverage, copy trading and quick onboarding, and who accept offshore, unlicensed oversight. Confirm that your country is allowed, treat the reserve ratios as company-reported, enable every security control, avoid look-alike sites, and keep long-term holdings in self-custody.
Twenty-fourth of twenty-six: low fees, optional KYC and a published reserve proof, but no major licence, an unclear legal entity and poor consumer ratings.
BloFin scores 51, just behind Bitrue (51.25) and ahead of LBank (50.5) and HTX (45.5); it trails Kraken (74), Bitvavo (70), Coinbase (69.25), OKX (69), Crypto.com (67.75), Bybit and Gate (66), Upbit (64.5), WhiteBIT (64.25), Bitpanda (63.75), Binance (61.25), Bitget (59.5), BingX (59.25), Robinhood Crypto (59), Bitfinex (58.75), KuCoin (58.5), MEXC (58), Bitstamp (57.75), Gemini (57.25), Bithumb (55.5), Binance.US (53.75) and Phemex (52.5). It earns its marks on low fees, a deep perpetuals list, copy trading, a clean public incident record and a verifiable Merkle-tree reserve proof. It loses ground on the absence of any major licence, conflicting information about its legal entity, no named reserve auditor, an undisclosed hot-wallet share and a Trustpilot score near 1.9 out of 5. Revisit the score if BloFin names an independent reserve auditor, obtains a major licence or clarifies its legal entity.
The scorecard above is deliberately general. Whether BloFin is right for you depends on where you live, how much leverage you use and how much risk you accept from an unlicensed offshore venue with weak consumer ratings.
The experienced derivatives trader
Low futures fees at VIP tiers, up to 150x leverage, API and webhooks and quick onboarding suit people who already manage leveraged risk.
The copy trader who diversifies leaders
Spot and futures copy trading with a transparent leaderboard and risk-control tools is a real draw, with leverage risk to match.
The privacy-minded trader
Optional KYC is convenient, but it comes with thinner oversight, a murky legal entity and limited recourse if something goes wrong.
The US or Canadian resident, or the cautious holder
Those markets are excluded, and anyone who needs a licensed venue or reliable support should look elsewhere.
These four tables cover the specifics we didn't want to bury in prose: the fee picture, the reserves and incident timeline, regulatory footprint, and how the exchanges in this series compare.
What BloFin charges (and where sources conflict)
| Item | Maker | Taker | Source note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spot, base | 0.10% | 0.10% | Cryptonomist, CryptoWinRate and BeInCrypto agree |
| Perpetual futures, regular | 0.020% | 0.060% | Cryptonomist and CryptoWinRate; the taker is high until VIP 1 |
| Perpetual futures, VIP 1 | 0.006% | 0.050% | Cryptonomist; reportedly needs $50,000 in assets, no volume |
| Perpetual futures, top tiers | 0% | 0.035% | CryptoWinRate; tier requirements not confirmed |
| New-pair promotions | 0% | Discounted | Traders Union; limited-time and pair-specific |
| Conflicting figure | 0.10% | 0.10% | Cryptonews quotes a 0.10% starting fee for perpetuals; conflicts with other sources |
| Copy trading | Free to copy | 10% to 20% | Cryptonomist; the percentage is the lead trader’s profit share |
| Deposits and withdrawals | Not found | Not found | No reliable schedule found; no direct fiat deposits per FXEmpire |
We could not load BloFin’s live fee schedule, only third-party summaries. Affiliate-style and promotional pages were excluded or used only where labelled. Check current figures before trading.
Security, reserves and incident timeline
| Date | Event | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Launch | BloFin founded; no publicly reported breach since, per Cryptonomist (August 2026) |
| Nov 2024 and Jan 31, 2025 | Impersonation warnings | BloFin warns about clone sites such as BloFinex, where users reported failed withdrawals |
| Jan 16, 2026 | Network support cut | Deposits and withdrawals of some tokens on certain networks stop (via Traders Union) |
| May 5, 2026 | Incident data | CoinGecko, using cer.live data, lists no recorded incidents |
| May 15, 2026 | Reserve ratios | USDT 105.77%, BTC 149.67%, ETH 162.97% (BloFin Academy, company-reported) |
| Aug 2026 | Tokenized trading | 24/7 trading on 75+ perpetual markets and 13 tokenized spot markets (company, via Traders Union) |
| To date | Confirmed hacks | None found in the sources we reviewed; absence of reports is not proof of strong controls |
Reserve ratios are company-reported point-in-time snapshots. No third-party auditor is named, the cold-versus-hot wallet split is undisclosed, and the Fireblocks insurance cover some reviewers mention is unverified.
Where BloFin stands with regulators
| Region | Status |
|---|---|
| Company | Founded 2019; entity reported as Cayman Islands (Cryptonomist), BuildLight Future Limited in the Marshall Islands (CoinPerps) and British Virgin Islands (press-release dateline); sources conflict |
| Major regulators | No licence found from a major regulator; no enforcement action found in the sources we reviewed |
| United States | Excluded; DataWallet’s review page claims a FinCEN MSB registration but its restricted-countries page says none is active, and CoinPerps could not find one |
| Canada | Excluded (DataWallet) |
| Singapore | DataWallet reports a business registration without a payment licence; a press-release claim of a MAS-linked registration is unverified |
| Cayman Islands | Claimed CIMA fund licence is unverified |
| Europe | No MiCA authorisation found; a Mastercard-linked card is reported as EEA-only (CoinPerps) |
| Restricted | More than 40 jurisdictions, expandable at BloFin’s discretion (CoinPerps); tokenized-stock derivatives also barred in the US and UK |
Registration claims differ by source and could not be verified on registries. Verify any licence on the relevant regulator’s register before relying on it.
Series 10 so far
| Binance | Kraken | Coinbase | Gate | OKX | Bybit | MEXC | HTX | Bitfinex | Bitget | Crypto.com | Bitrue | Binance.US | KuCoin | Bitstamp | Gemini | Upbit | Bitvavo | Bitpanda | Robinhood | Bithumb | BingX | Phemex | LBank | WhiteBIT | BloFin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Security (30) | 5.5 | 8.0 | 7.5 | 6.5 | 7.5 | 6.5 | 6.0 | 4.5 | 5.5 | 5.0 | 7.0 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 6.5 | 6.0 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 7.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 5.5 | 5.0 | 4.5 | 6.5 | 5.5 |
| Regulation (20) | 4.0 | 8.5 | 8.5 | 6.5 | 6.0 | 6.5 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 4.5 | 5.5 | 8.0 | 3.5 | 5.0 | 3.5 | 8.0 | 7.0 | 6.5 | 8.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 4.5 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 6.0 | 2.5 |
| Fees (15) | 8.5 | 6.0 | 4.5 | 7.0 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 8.0 | 5.5 | 9.0 | 6.5 | 5.5 | 6.5 | 9.0 | 6.5 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 8.5 | 7.0 | 5.0 | 4.5 | 8.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.5 | 7.0 |
| Coverage (10) | 9.5 | 8.0 | 7.5 | 9.5 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 9.5 | 8.0 | 6.5 | 8.5 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 5.5 | 9.0 | 5.0 | 5.5 | 6.5 | 7.0 | 8.5 | 5.5 | 6.5 | 8.5 | 8.0 | 8.5 | 6.5 | 7.0 |
| Experience (10) | 7.0 | 7.5 | 8.0 | 7.0 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 6.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 6.0 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 6.5 | 7.0 | 6.5 |
| Support (10) | 3.5 | 4.5 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 3.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 4.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 4.5 | 2.5 |
| Ecosystem (5) | 8.0 | 8.0 | 9.0 | 8.0 | 8.5 | 8.0 | 7.0 | 6.5 | 7.5 | 8.5 | 9.0 | 7.0 | 4.5 | 7.5 | 4.5 | 6.5 | 5.5 | 6.0 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 5.0 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 6.0 |
| Our score | 61.25/100 | 74/100 | 69.25/100 | 66/100 | 69/100 | 66/100 | 58/100 | 45.5/100 | 58.75/100 | 59.5/100 | 67.75/100 | 51.25/100 | 53.75/100 | 58.5/100 | 57.75/100 | 57.25/100 | 64.5/100 | 70/100 | 63.75/100 | 59/100 | 55.5/100 | 59.25/100 | 52.5/100 | 50.5/100 | 64.25/100 | 51/100 |
Category scores are out of 10 and weighted as shown, taken from each review in this series.
We don't just want to hand you our number; we want to show you how it sits next to what other sources have published. Round-ups like the low fees, copy trading and optional KYC, but consumer ratings and regulatory commentary are harsh, and our score lands above the blended figure.
Our score lands above the aggregated figure, because the missing licence, conflicting legal entity and weak consumer ratings pull the blend down, while our scorecard credits the low fees, the clean public incident record and the verifiable Merkle-tree reserve proof.
| Source | Score | Type |
|---|
Scores compiled by our editorial team from publicly available reviews as of November 2026. "Estimate" means the source didn't publish a single numeric score, so we converted its published verdict and sentiment into a comparable 100-point figure. Verify current figures directly with each source before citing them elsewhere.
We found no publicly reported hack since BloFin launched in 2019, and it publishes a Merkle-tree Proof of Reserves with ratios above 100% in May 2026, though those figures are company-reported and no third-party auditor is named. BloFin holds no licence from a major regulator, and sources disagree on its legal entity, so it is an offshore venue with limited recourse.
We found none from a major regulator. Sources name the Cayman Islands, the Marshall Islands (BuildLight Future Limited) and the British Virgin Islands. DataWallet’s review page claims a US FinCEN registration and a Cayman CIMA fund licence, but its own restricted-countries page says there is no active MSB status and another comparison site could not find either on a registry, so we treat those claims as unverified.
Basic trading is reported to work without KYC, with a daily withdrawal cap of about 20,000 USDT for unverified accounts and higher caps at Level 1 and Level 2. The figures come from a comparison site, not BloFin’s own pages, and rules can change. Optional KYC also means thinner oversight, so keep only what you are willing to risk on the platform.
Spot is a flat 0.10% maker and taker. Perpetual futures start at 0.020% maker and 0.060% taker, falling to 0.006% and 0.050% at VIP 1, which reportedly needs $50,000 in account assets, and to 0% maker and 0.035% taker at the top tiers. One source quotes a different starting rate for perpetuals, and we could not find a reliable withdrawal fee schedule.
No. The US and Canada are excluded, and more than 40 jurisdictions are blocked in total, per comparison sites; BloFin can extend the list at its discretion. Using a VPN to get around restrictions can lead to frozen accounts, so check the current terms for your country first.
Yes. BloFin uses a Merkle-tree Proof of Reserves with an open-source tool for checking your own balance, tracked through Nansen. Its Academy page gives ratios as of May 15, 2026 of 105.77% for USDT, 149.67% for BTC and 162.97% for ETH. These are company-reported snapshots with no named auditor, and BloFin says the cold-versus-hot wallet split is not disclosed.
We found no publicly reported hack, and cer.live data on CoinGecko listed no incidents as of May 5, 2026. BloFin has warned users about clone sites such as BloFinex, where victims reported failed withdrawals. A clean record is not proof of strong security, particularly in a year when several large exchanges were breached.
Copy trading covers spot and futures. Copiers pay no extra fee other than a profit share to the lead trader, which Cryptonomist puts at 10% and up to 20% for eligible traders, and the leaderboard shows Sharpe, Sortino and Calmar ratios. BloFin added automated risk-control tools in 2026. Leveraged copy trading can lose money quickly, and past performance does not predict future results.
More Reviews
Upbit – CEX Review
Upbit Exchange Review: Scored Out of 100 (November 2026) | The Block Note The Block Note Scorecard Sign up Verdict Details vs. Market FAQ...
Read MoreCoinSpot – CEX Review
CoinSpot Exchange Review: Scored Out of 100 (November 2026) | The Block Note The Block Note Scorecard Sign up Verdict Details vs. Market FAQ...
Read MoreBinance – CEX Review
Binance leads centralized crypto exchanges with high liquidity, low fees, and vast token support; setting the benchmark for speed, security, and global access.
Read MoreBitvavo – CEX Review
Bitvavo Exchange Review: Scored Out of 100 (November 2026) | The Block Note The Block Note Scorecard Sign up Verdict Details vs. Market FAQ...
Read More
