Bitso Exchange Review: Scored Out of 100 (November 2026) | The Block Note
Crypto Centralized Exchanges Review · Updated November 2026

Bitso review: Latin America’s local-rails exchange, with regulated local entities and free SPEI and PIX transfers, but high entry fees, frequent outages, weak support ratings and a Brazilian retail exit.

Twenty-eighth in our Crypto Centralized Exchanges series. Bitso, founded in 2014 in Mexico City, offers MXN, ARS, BRL and COP markets, free local transfers by SPEI, PIX, COELSA and PSE, and regulated local entities in Mexico, Argentina and Gibraltar. It has had no major hack reported since a 2018 provider incident, holds ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and SOC 2 Type 1, and signs reserve addresses on-chain with a zero-knowledge proof. Entry-tier fees sit near 0.50% / 0.65% in local currencies, the asset list is moderate with no derivatives, a status tracker counts about 60 outages in two years, Trustpilot shows about 2.4 to 2.5 out of 5, and Brazilian retail customers moved to Mercado Bitcoin in September 2026. We weighted all of it.

Type Latin America spot and payments exchange Spot fee 0.50% / 0.65% MXN, entry tier Founded 2014 Licences Mexico IFPE, Argentina, Gibraltar DLT
BITSO
Exchange · Global
Spot; local rails; payments
Local rails, regulated entities, outages

Our take, up front: Bitso, founded in 2014 in Mexico City, is the Latin American exchange with the strongest local plumbing: free SPEI, PIX, COELSA and PSE transfers, MXN, ARS, BRL and COP markets, and regulated local entities in Mexico, Argentina and Gibraltar. It has had no major hack reported since a 2018 provider incident, holds ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and SOC 2 Type 1, and signs reserve addresses on-chain with a zero-knowledge proof. The weaknesses are plain: entry-tier fees near 0.50% / 0.65% in local currencies, a moderate asset list with no derivatives, about 60 outages in two years, an unnamed auditor, poor Trustpilot ratings, and the September 2026 move of Brazilian retail customers to Mercado Bitcoin. We score it 60, twelfth of twenty-eight: just behind Binance and ahead of Bitget.

Bitso has a long operating record with one disclosed incident and a security programme that is better documented than most, though its solvency evidence is thinner than it sounds. Its own trust page says it holds client assets in segregated multi-signature wallets, is certified to ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and holds a SOC 2 Type 1 report (undated). It also says monthly third-party audits use zero-knowledge technology, but it names no auditor and gives no dates. A Bitso support article adds that it proves control of reserve addresses by signing messages on-chain, with a zk-SNARK hiding the wallet addresses, and warns that reserves alone do not prove coverage of customer obligations. A MEXC-hosted review (promotional) cites CCSS Level 2. Bitso mentions insurance-backed protection without naming an insurer or a limit, and says products are not government-insured. The one disclosed incident dates from July 5, 2018, when a cyberattack on a provider led Bitso to disable funding and withdrawals as a precaution; service was restored on July 10, 2018 and Bitso said it suffered no loss. Reviewers report no major hack since. Reliability is the recurring weakness: a status-page tracker (Pingoru) counts 60 outages in two years, roughly 17 hours 51 minutes of downtime, including MXN withdrawals disabled for about 19.5 hours on April 26 to 27, 2026.

Why this scores above the midpoint: a long record with no major hack since 2018, ISO 27001, SOC 2 and zero-knowledge reserve signing, held back by an unnamed auditor, no named insurer and frequent operational outages.

Pros

  • No major hack reported since the 2018 provider incident; ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and SOC 2 Type 1
  • On-chain reserve signing with a zk-SNARK, plus segregated multi-signature wallets

Cons

  • Monthly audits are claimed without an auditor name or dates; no named insurer
  • About 60 outages in two years per a status tracker, including a 19.5-hour MXN withdrawal outage

Bitso operates through local entities with local regulators rather than one global licence, which is stronger than most offshore rivals but uneven. According to its trust page, in Mexico it operates as Nvio Pagos México, an IFPE regulated under the Fintech Law. In Argentina it operates as Nvio Pagos Argentina, a payment service provider regulated by the central bank (BCRA), and WhereLegalCrypto reported a CNV virtual asset service provider registration in April 2026. In Gibraltar, The Badger Technology Company Limited holds a DLT licence from the GFSC, granted in 2019. In Colombia the arrangement is a regulatory sandbox through Banco de Bogotá, and no specific licence is named. The page also says Bitso is not authorised for crypto-asset services under MiCA and that residents of Spain should not open accounts. Brazil is the live question. Bitso’s Brazilian entity is a Central Bank of Brazil authorised payment institution, but Brazil’s Resolutions 519 and 520 (November 10, 2025) created a new authorisation regime for crypto service providers, effective February 2, 2026, with an October 30, 2026 filing deadline. Valor Econômico reported on September 1, 2026, via CriptoNoticias, a commercial agreement under which Bitso’s individual customers in Brazil move to Mercado Bitcoin while Bitso keeps the institutional segment. Bitso and Mercado Bitcoin present it as a payments alliance and not as a response to the new rules, and we could not confirm that Bitso applied for the new authorisation.

Why this scores above the midpoint: real local licences in Mexico, Argentina and Gibraltar, held back by a Colombian sandbox arrangement, no MiCA authorisation, no US presence and the Brazilian retail exit.

Pros

  • Regulated local entities in Mexico (IFPE), Argentina (BCRA) and Gibraltar (DLT)
  • Clear public statement of where Bitso is and is not authorised

Cons

  • Brazilian retail customers moved to Mercado Bitcoin in September 2026
  • Colombia is a sandbox arrangement; no MiCA authorisation; not authorised in Spain

Bitso’s fees are tiered by market and by 30-day volume, and they are not cheap at the entry tier. On its fees page, as quoted in snippets and third-party summaries that differ by date, the MXN markets start at about 0.500% maker and 0.650% taker below 1.5 million MXN of volume, falling to about 0.440% and 0.572% above 5 million; older third-party figures show 0.600% and 0.780%, and Rankia gave about 0.50% and 0.65% in September 2026. USDC and USDT markets start at about 0.300% and 0.360% below 1,000 USD and fall to about 0.137% and 0.205% above 50,000 USD (FitGap), while another snippet shows 0.095% and 0.099% on large USDT tiers, so tiers have clearly changed. BTC markets start around 0.075% maker and 0.098% taker below 8 BTC. Argentine peso markets start at 0.450% and 0.600%, Brazilian real markets at 0.200% and 0.400%, and Colombian peso markets at 0.500% and 0.650%. Local transfers by SPEI, PIX, COELSA and PSE are free, a USD ACH deposit costs $2.99 and a USD wire withdrawal $11.99 plus 0.17% (FitGap). The in-app quick buy includes a spread that is not itemised, and crypto withdrawals follow network costs.

Why this scores at the midpoint: competitive BTC and large-tier stablecoin fees and free local transfers, but high entry-tier fees in local currencies, an unitemised quick-buy spread and fee snapshots that conflict.

Pros

  • Free SPEI, PIX, COELSA and PSE local transfers
  • BTC market fees start near 0.075% / 0.098%, and tiers fall with volume

Cons

  • MXN and COP markets start near 0.50% / 0.65%; quick buy adds an unitemised spread
  • Fee snapshots conflict by date and market; we could not confirm the live schedule

Coverage is moderate, and it is built around Latin American fiat rather than breadth. The asset count conflicts by source: Bitget and TradingFinder say 50+, FXEmpire counted 55 assets and 90 pairs in February 2026, and a MEXC-hosted review says 100+. Fiat pairs cover the Mexican peso, Argentine peso, Brazilian real and Colombian peso, which is the main draw. There is no P2P market, no copy trading and no futures in the exchange. Bitso Onchain, a DEX layer, offers 17,000+ tokens across 14 chains (company-reported), with a perpetuals aggregator and a native token planned for 2026. Its stablecoins include MXNB and a USDPT listing, and Bitso Business handles B2B payments. An aggregator says Argentine users have had tokenized xStocks since April 2026; we could not verify this.

Why this scores at the midpoint: a modest listed-asset count and no derivatives, offset by four local fiat markets, on-chain access to a very wide token set and payments products.

Pros

  • MXN, ARS, BRL and COP fiat markets
  • Bitso Onchain adds 17,000+ tokens across 14 chains (company-reported)

Cons

  • Asset counts conflict (50+, 55 or 100+); no P2P, futures or copy trading
  • Perpetuals aggregator and native token are planned, not confirmed live

The experience is strongest for people inside Latin America. Local rails make funding simple, with free SPEI in Mexico, PIX in Brazil, COELSA in Argentina and PSE in Colombia, and Bitso Alpha gives a pro order-book view. Bitso says it has 9 million+ customers (company-reported, 2025 report). FXEmpire’s February 2026 review was more guarded, at 3.1 out of 5 overall, 3.3 for trading experience, and 2.5 for deposits and withdrawals, 2.5 for coins and 2.5 for security. G2 shows 4.4 out of 5 on only 14 reviews. Reviewers also describe locked accounts and delayed withdrawals, which we cover under support, and outages (see security) interrupt the experience.

Why this scores well: simple local-currency funding and a mature app, offset by FXEmpire’s weaker deposit and withdrawal marks and recurring outages.

Pros

  • Free local rails in four countries and a pro order-book mode (Bitso Alpha)
  • 9 million+ customers claimed (company-reported)

Cons

  • FXEmpire rates deposits and withdrawals and coins only 2.5 out of 5
  • Outages and account locks interrupt use

Support is the weak spot. Trustpilot shows roughly 2.4 to 2.5 out of 5 on 53 reviews according to rfp.wiki, while a comparison page cites 2.3 on 2,252 reviews that may be a different listing, so the figures conflict. TradingFinder (older) gave 1.8 out of 5 on 38 ratings with 82% negative, and Reviews.io shows 1.3 out of 5 on 168 reviews with 7% recommending, although some entries on that page look like spam or recovery-scam promotion. G2 is far kinder at 4.4 out of 5 on 14 reviews. The recurring complaints are locked accounts, delayed withdrawals and slow replies, and FXEmpire lists live chat as the support channel. These are individual reports we could not verify, and ratings sites skew toward unhappy users.

Why this scores low: poor and conflicting consumer ratings with repeated complaints about locked accounts and slow replies, partly offset by a live chat channel and a few more positive review sites.

Pros

  • Live chat support (FXEmpire)
  • G2 shows 4.4 out of 5, though on only 14 reviews

Cons

  • Trustpilot about 2.4 to 2.5 out of 5; Reviews.io 1.3 out of 5; figures conflict
  • Recurring complaints about locked accounts and delayed withdrawals

Bitso’s extras are payments-led, which is unusual and valuable for its markets. It says it handled 14.7% of US-to-Mexico remittances from January to August 2026 (company-reported, via Expansión and Rio Times), and Ripple and its MXNB peso stablecoin were in the news in June 2026. It also supported a Western Union USDPT listing for Mexico. Bitso Business sells B2B payments, and Bitso Onchain adds a DEX with a native token planned for 2026. Daniel Vogel is CEO. An aggregator quotes Earn at up to 7% APY, which we could not verify and treat as unconfirmed. There is no copy trading or launchpad of the kind larger exchanges run.

Why this scores well: real payments and stablecoin infrastructure and a business arm, but the native token and perps aggregator are still planned and several figures are company-reported.

Pros

  • Remittance, MXNB stablecoin and Bitso Business payments products
  • Bitso Onchain DEX layer

Cons

  • Remittance share and customer counts are company-reported
  • Native token and perps aggregator are planned, not confirmed live
Where to sign up

A Latin America-focused exchange with free local rails and regulated local entities, but weigh the entry-tier fees, the outages, the weak support ratings and the Brazilian retail exit.

Bitso suits residents of Mexico, Argentina and Colombia who want to move local currency in and out of crypto and stablecoins over local bank rails, and businesses that need payments. Check the current fee tier for your market, avoid the quick-buy spread on larger trades, enable every security control, test a small withdrawal first, and keep long-term holdings in self-custody.

0/ 100

Twelfth of twenty-eight: regulated local entities, free local rails and no major hack since 2018, but high entry fees, frequent outages and poor consumer ratings.

Bitso scores 60, just behind Binance (61.25) and ahead of Bitget (59.5), BingX (59.25), Robinhood Crypto (59), Bitfinex (58.75), KuCoin (58.5), MEXC (58), Bitstamp (57.75), Gemini (57.25), Bithumb (55.5), Toobit (54), Binance.US (53.75), Phemex (52.5), Bitrue (51.25), BloFin (51), LBank (50.5) and HTX (45.5); it trails Kraken (74), Bitvavo (70), Coinbase (69.25), OKX (69), Crypto.com (67.75), Bybit and Gate (66), Upbit (64.5), WhiteBIT (64.25) and Bitpanda (63.75). It earns its marks on regulated local entities, free local rails, no major hack since 2018 and its payments products. It loses ground on entry-tier fees, a moderate asset list with no derivatives, frequent outages, an unnamed auditor and poor Trustpilot ratings. Revisit the score if Bitso names its reserve auditor, resolves the outage record or secures a new Brazilian authorisation.

Best forResidents of Mexico, Argentina and Colombia who want local-currency access to crypto and stablecoins over local bank rails
Not forDerivatives traders, anyone outside Bitso’s markets, residents of Spain and the US, or users who rely on responsive support
Score Ledger
bitso exchange · 7 line items
01Security19.5
02Regulation14.0
03Fees7.5
04Coverage5.0
05Experience7.5
06Support3.0
07Ecosystem3.5
TOTAL60
≈ 60 / 100; Local rails, regulated entities, outages

The scorecard above is deliberately general. Whether Bitso is right for you depends on where you live, which local currency you use and how much operational risk you accept from an exchange with frequent outages and weak support ratings.

Best fit

The Mexican, Argentine or Colombian saver

Free SPEI, COELSA and PSE transfers and local-currency markets make moving between pesos and crypto simple for residents of those countries.

Good fit

The remittance or business user

US-to-Mexico transfers, the MXNB stablecoin and Bitso Business payments suit people and firms that move money across the border.

Workable fit

The large-volume trader

Fees fall with 30-day volume and BTC and stablecoin tiers are reasonable, but entry tiers in local currencies are high and there are no derivatives.

Poor fit

The Brazilian retail user, or anyone who needs reliable support

Brazilian retail customers have moved to Mercado Bitcoin, and low consumer ratings and recurring outages make time-critical use risky.

These four tables cover the specifics we didn't want to bury in prose: the fee picture, the reserves and incident timeline, regulatory footprint, and how the exchanges in this series compare.

What Bitso charges (and where sources conflict)

ItemMakerTakerSource note
MXN markets, entry tier0.500%0.650%Bitso fees page via snippets, below 1.5M MXN of volume; older figures show 0.600% / 0.780%; Rankia (Sept 2026) about 0.50% / 0.65%
MXN markets, top tier0.440%0.572%Above 5M MXN of volume
USDC / USDT markets0.300%0.360%FitGap, below 1,000 USD, falling to 0.137% / 0.205% above 50,000 USD; another snippet shows 0.095% / 0.099% on large USDT tiers
BTC markets0.075%0.098%Below 8 BTC, falling to 0.065% / 0.085%
ARS markets0.450%0.600%Below 1.625M ARS, falling to 0.320% / 0.450%
BRL markets0.200%0.400%Falling to 0.150% / 0.274%; Brazilian retail customers have since moved to Mercado Bitcoin
COP markets0.500%0.650%Falling to 0.360% / 0.470%
Local transfersFreeFreeSPEI, PIX, COELSA and PSE
USD ACH deposit / wire withdrawal$2.99$11.99 + 0.17%FitGap
Quick buy in the appSpreadSpreadIncluded in the price and not itemised

We could not load Bitso’s live fee page, only snippets and third-party summaries, and tiers differ by market and date. Competitor, promotional and affiliate-style pages were excluded or used only where labelled. Check current figures before trading.

Security, reserves and incident timeline

DateEventDetail
2014FoundedMexico City
Jul 5 to 10, 2018Provider cyberattackFunding and withdrawals disabled as a precaution; restored July 10, 2018; Bitso said it suffered no loss
Mar 3, 2025Withdrawal outageBTC, LTC, BCH and XRP withdrawals affected for about an hour (status page)
Jan 12, 2026Stock-trading issueStatus-page incident
Apr 26 to 27, 2026MXN withdrawals disabledAbout 19.5 hours, SPEI-related (status page)
Jun 12, 2026ARS withdrawals outageAttributed to a third-party provider
Sep 1, 2026Brazil retail moveIndividual Brazilian customers move to Mercado Bitcoin (Valor Econômico via CriptoNoticias)
To dateMajor hacks since 2018None reported in the sources we reviewed; absence of reports is not proof of strong controls

A status-page tracker (Pingoru) counts about 60 outages in two years, roughly 17 hours 51 minutes of downtime. Bitso says monthly third-party audits use zero-knowledge technology but names no auditor, and it names no insurer. We could not open any audit report.

Where Bitso stands with regulators

RegionStatus
MexicoNvio Pagos México, an IFPE regulated under the Fintech Law (Bitso trust page)
ArgentinaNvio Pagos Argentina, a payment service provider regulated by the central bank; a CNV VASP registration was reported in April 2026 (WhereLegalCrypto)
BrazilPayment institution authorised by the central bank; new crypto authorisation regime effective Feb 2, 2026 with an Oct 30, 2026 filing deadline; retail customers moved to Mercado Bitcoin; we could not confirm a new application
ColombiaRegulatory sandbox through Banco de Bogotá; no specific licence named
GibraltarDLT licence from the GFSC (The Badger Technology Company Limited), granted in 2019
EuropeNot authorised under MiCA; residents of Spain should not open accounts

Registration claims come mainly from Bitso’s own trust page and could not be verified on registries. Verify any licence on the relevant regulator’s register before relying on it.

Series 10 so far

BinanceKrakenCoinbaseGateOKXBybitMEXCHTXBitfinexBitgetCrypto.comBitrueBinance.USKuCoinBitstampGeminiUpbitBitvavoBitpandaRobinhoodBithumbBingXPhemexLBankWhiteBITBloFinToobitBitso
Security (30)5.58.07.56.57.56.56.04.55.55.07.04.54.56.56.06.56.57.06.06.05.05.55.04.56.55.55.56.5
Regulation (20)4.08.58.56.56.06.53.02.04.55.58.03.55.03.58.07.06.58.07.07.04.55.03.03.06.02.53.07.0
Fees (15)8.56.04.57.07.57.08.05.59.06.55.56.59.06.55.04.08.57.05.04.58.07.07.07.07.57.07.55.0
Coverage (10)9.58.07.59.58.08.09.58.06.58.58.08.05.59.05.05.56.57.08.55.56.58.58.08.56.57.08.05.0
Experience (10)7.07.58.07.07.57.57.06.56.57.57.57.07.07.06.07.07.08.08.08.06.07.57.06.57.06.57.07.5
Support (10)3.54.53.02.53.53.52.02.03.03.52.52.52.02.53.02.03.04.54.03.04.52.52.52.04.52.52.03.0
Ecosystem (5)8.08.09.08.08.58.07.06.57.58.59.07.04.57.54.56.55.56.07.57.55.07.57.07.07.06.06.57.0
Our score61.25/10074/10069.25/10066/10069/10066/10058/10045.5/10058.75/10059.5/10067.75/10051.25/10053.75/10058.5/10057.75/10057.25/10064.5/10070/10063.75/10059/10055.5/10059.25/10052.5/10050.5/10064.25/10051/10054/10060/100

Category scores are out of 10 and weighted as shown, taken from each review in this series.

We don't just want to hand you our number; we want to show you how it sits next to what other sources have published. Round-ups like the local rails and regulated entities, but consumer ratings are harsh and security commentary is mixed, and our score lands above the blended figure.

The Block Note (us)N/A / 100
Industry averageN/A / 100

Our score lands above the aggregated figure, because poor consumer ratings and an unnamed auditor pull the blend down, while our scorecard credits the regulated local entities, free local rails and the absence of a major hack since 2018.

SourceScoreType

Scores compiled by our editorial team from publicly available reviews as of November 2026. "Estimate" means the source didn't publish a single numeric score, so we converted its published verdict and sentiment into a comparable 100-point figure. Verify current figures directly with each source before citing them elsewhere.

Bitso has had no major hack reported since a July 2018 provider incident (it said it lost nothing), and it cites ISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type 1 and segregated multi-signature wallets. It operates through regulated local entities rather than one global licence, and a status tracker counts about 60 outages in two years, so keep only what you need on the platform.

Per Bitso’s trust page, Nvio Pagos México is an IFPE regulated under the Mexican Fintech Law, Nvio Pagos Argentina is regulated by the central bank, and The Badger Technology Company Limited holds a Gibraltar DLT licence from the GFSC. Colombia runs through a regulatory sandbox with Banco de Bogotá, and Bitso says it is not authorised under MiCA and that residents of Spain should not open accounts.

Valor Econômico reported on September 1, 2026, via CriptoNoticias, that Bitso’s individual customers in Brazil are moving to Mercado Bitcoin under a commercial agreement, while Bitso keeps the institutional segment. It coincides with Brazil’s new crypto authorisation regime, which had an October 30, 2026 filing deadline, but both companies describe it as a payments alliance and we could not confirm that Bitso applied. Argentine clients are unaffected.

Partly. Bitso says monthly third-party audits use zero-knowledge technology but names no auditor and gives no dates. A support article says it proves control of reserve addresses by signing messages on-chain, with a zk-SNARK hiding the addresses, and warns that reserves alone do not prove coverage of customer obligations.

Fees are tiered by market and volume and the sources differ by date. MXN markets start near 0.500% maker and 0.650% taker, USDC and USDT markets near 0.300% and 0.360%, and BTC markets near 0.075% and 0.098%, falling with volume. Local transfers by SPEI, PIX, COELSA and PSE are free, and the in-app quick buy includes a spread that is not itemised.

No. We found no futures, P2P market or copy trading on the exchange. Bitso Onchain offers a DEX layer with 17,000+ tokens across 14 chains (company-reported), and a perpetuals aggregator and native token are planned for 2026.

Ratings are poor and conflict by source: Trustpilot about 2.4 to 2.5 out of 5, TradingFinder (older) 1.8, Reviews.io 1.3, while G2 shows 4.4 on only 14 reviews. Common complaints are locked accounts, delayed withdrawals and slow replies; these are individual reports we could not verify.

Bitso scores 60 against Binance’s 61.25. Bitso has regulated local entities, free local rails and no major hack since 2018, while Binance offers far more assets, derivatives and lower fees; Binance’s security score is held back by its history, and both draw support complaints.

Editorial disclosure: This page may contain affiliate or referral links, and we may earn a commission if you sign up through one. That relationship never influences a score: scores are set by our editorial methodology before any review is published, and no company pays us for coverage or can change a result. Centralized exchanges carry real, structural risk regardless of which one you use, including custody, hack, insider, insolvency and regulatory risk. Nothing here is financial or investment advice.
Facts, fees and licence details verified against public sources as of Nov 10, 2026; Bitso's fees, reserves, licences and availability change, so always confirm them directly with Bitso and your local regulator.

More Reviews

Upbit – CEX Review

Upbit Exchange Review: Scored Out of 100 (November 2026) | The Block Note The Block Note Scorecard Sign up Verdict Details vs. Market FAQ...

Read More

CoinSpot – CEX Review

CoinSpot Exchange Review: Scored Out of 100 (November 2026) | The Block Note The Block Note Scorecard Sign up Verdict Details vs. Market FAQ...

Read More
binance exchange profile banner

Binance – CEX Review

Binance leads centralized crypto exchanges with high liquidity, low fees, and vast token support; setting the benchmark for speed, security, and global access.

Read More

Bitvavo – CEX Review

Bitvavo Exchange Review: Scored Out of 100 (November 2026) | The Block Note The Block Note Scorecard Sign up Verdict Details vs. Market FAQ...

Read More