Bithumb Exchange Review: Scored Out of 100 (November 2026) | The Block Note
Crypto Centralized Exchanges Review · Updated November 2026

Bithumb review: a low-fee Korean exchange with a record AML fine, a 620,000 BTC ledger error and domestic-only access.

Twenty-first in our Crypto Centralized Exchanges series. Bithumb, founded in Seoul in 2014, is South Korea’s second-largest exchange, with a won market charging a reported 0.04%, cold-storage custody it says exceeds the statutory ratio and 24-hour phone and walk-in support. It also credited 249 users with 620,000 BTC it did not hold in February 2026, took a record 36.8 billion won AML fine in March, has no independent proof of reserves, and is aimed at Korean residents. We weighted all of it.

Type Korean domestic exchange Spot fee 0.04% reported (won market) Founded 2014 Supervisor FSC and FIU (Korea)
BITHUMB
Exchange · Korea
Spot; won market
Cheap, domestic, scarred record

Our take, up front: Bithumb, founded in Seoul in 2014, is South Korea’s second-largest exchange, with a won market charging a reported 0.04%, cold-storage custody it says exceeds the statutory ratio and a 24-hour phone and walk-in support desk. It is also the exchange that credited 249 users with 620,000 BTC it did not hold in February 2026, took a record 36.8 billion won AML fine the following month, and carries an ownership overhang ahead of a 2028 IPO target. We found no independent proof of reserves and no reliable consumer rating, and it serves mainly Korean residents. We score it 55.5, eighteenth of twenty-one: just below Gemini and above Binance.US.

Bithumb says it keeps customer assets in offline cold wallets at a ratio above the statutory minimum and uses MPC-based signing with multi-person approval (company-reported); Korean rules require at least 80% of assets in cold storage (Block Media). Block Media also describes a design with one cold wallet and one hot wallet per asset, where deposits go straight to cold storage and the hot wallet is used only for withdrawals. It holds ISMS-P certification (first reported in February 2023). Those are real positives, but the record is poor. Bithumb suffered four reported security incidents between 2017 and 2019: about $7 million in February 2017 (reported), a staff-computer compromise in July 2017 that exposed data on roughly 30,000 customers and led to follow-on scam thefts, about 35 billion won (around $31 million) from hot wallets in June 2018, and a March 2019 loss of about $13 million that Bithumb described as an insider incident (Wikipedia puts it near $20 million, so the figure conflicts). Bithumb compensated customers each time, and customer cold wallets were reported unaffected in 2019. The decisive event came on February 6, 2026: during a promotion, an employee entered the payout unit as BTC instead of won and credited 249 winners with 620,000 BTC, about 15 times the roughly 40,000 BTC the exchange held. Some recipients sold, the Bitcoin price on Bithumb briefly fell to about 81.1 million won, and Bithumb recovered 99.7%, with about 125 BTC left unrecovered, and said it reimbursed the portion already sold from corporate reserves and compensated customers who sold at low prices. The regulator’s inspection reportedly also covers two similar earlier payout incidents. Customers were made whole, but the ledger showed balances that no reserve could have covered, and we found no independent proof-of-reserves programme. A single outlet also reported 13-hour altcoin withdrawal delays in August 2026 that the Financial Supervisory Service was reviewing; we could not confirm that elsewhere.

Why this scores below the midpoint: reasonable custody design and certification, but a 15-fold ledger error in 2026, a history of hot-wallet hacks and no independent reserve attestation.

Pros

  • Cold-storage custody above the statutory ratio (company-reported); ISMS-P certified
  • Customers compensated after past hacks and the 2026 error; 99.7% of the mis-credited BTC recovered

Cons

  • February 2026 error credited about 15 times the exchange’s actual BTC holdings
  • Four reported security incidents from 2017 to 2019; no independent proof of reserves found

Bithumb is a domestic Korean exchange regulated by the Financial Services Commission and its Financial Intelligence Unit, and it operates a won market through a real-name bank account at KB Kookmin Bank (SpotedCrypto; the partner changed from NH Nonghyup in March 2025). Its enforcement record is the heaviest in this series for AML. On March 16, 2026 the FIU announced a 36.8 billion won fine (about $24 million), described as the largest ever imposed on a Korean crypto exchange, plus a six-month partial suspension of external transfers for new customers from March 27 to September 26, a reprimand for the CEO and a six-month suspension for the reporting officer. The FIU found about 6.65 million violations, including 45,772 transfers with 18 unregistered overseas operators. The Seoul Administrative Court later stayed the suspension pending a final ruling, so the practical impact was limited, and we could not confirm the final outcome of Bithumb’s legal challenge or whether the fine has been settled. Separately, authorities fined Bithumb about $136,000 in June 2026 for sending user data overseas in breach of privacy rules, and the Financial Supervisory Service opened a formal investigation after the February error. Ownership has also been a long-running question: Bithumb Holdings owns about 73.56% of Bithumb, KOSDAQ-listed Bucket Studio reaches about 30% of the holding company through Vidente, a person alleged to be its real owner has faced embezzlement charges, and a sale of Bucket Studio was delayed. Kiwoom Securities was reported in June 2026 to be negotiating a stake, with no terms agreed.

Why this scores below the midpoint: it is licensed and supervised domestically, but the AML penalty was a record, a CEO reprimand followed, and the ownership structure remains clouded.

Pros

  • Domestic FIU supervision and a won market with a real-name bank account
  • Court stay limited the practical effect of the suspension

Cons

  • Record 36.8 billion won AML fine and CEO reprimand (March 2026)
  • Ownership questions; data-transfer fine; formal FSS investigation after the February error

Fees are Bithumb’s strongest point, although sources disagree on the headline rate. Asia Economy reported that from February 5, 2024 Bithumb applied a flat 0.04% to all assets on its won market, down from 0.25% and below Upbit’s 0.05%. CoinMarketCap lists 0.04% maker and taker on the won market and free trading on the BTC market. SpotedCrypto and an August 2026 Asia Economy article instead describe 0.04% as the rate with a coupon, and SpotedCrypto cites a 0.25% standard rate; we could not reconcile these, so we treat 0.04% as the likely effective rate and 0.25% as possible without a coupon. Bithumb ran a zero-fee campaign from October 2023 to February 2024 that lifted its market share sharply, and rivals are cutting again: Coinone moved to 0.04% on August 3, 2026 and Korbit announced zero fees on its won market for a year from August 24. Withdrawal costs are modest (SpotedCrypto lists 0.001 BTC for BTC and 1,000 won for won), but a lower fee does not guarantee a better price, because Upbit’s deeper liquidity can produce tighter spreads. We could not load Bithumb’s live fee page, so confirm current rates before trading.

Why this scores well: among the lowest published rates in this series, held back by conflicting reports about the base rate and thinner liquidity than Upbit.

Pros

  • 0.04% reported on the won market; BTC market reported free
  • Cheaper than Upbit’s 0.05% base rate on paper

Cons

  • Sources disagree on whether 0.04% needs a coupon
  • Thinner liquidity than Upbit can widen spreads

Bithumb is a spot-only venue. Coin counts depend on source: SpotedCrypto’s Q4 2025 comparison says 200+, its April 2026 comparison says 448, and CoinMarketCap says more than 440, so we treat it as roughly 200 to 450 depending on how listings and markets are counted. Staking is offered, and there are won, BTC and stablecoin markets; Bithumb held about 31% of Korean stablecoin trading value in June 2026 according to 4Pillars. We found no futures, margin or perpetuals, which is normal for a domestic Korean exchange, and no stock or ETF access. Coverage is broad for altcoins but narrow for products.

Why this scores a little above the midpoint: a wide altcoin list for a domestic exchange, but no derivatives and no access outside the Korean market.

Pros

  • Roughly 200 to 450 listed coins depending on source
  • Staking and a stablecoin market

Cons

  • Spot only; no futures, margin or traditional assets found
  • Coin count disagrees across sources

We found no reliable independent app-store or consumer rating for Bithumb, so this score rests on structure and reported features rather than a review average. The service is built for Korean residents: sign-up for the won market needs a Korean real-name bank account, and the interface and support are Korean-language first; we could not confirm how foreign residents are onboarded. Bithumb runs a customer lounge in Seoul’s Gangnam district, and the mid-2026 withdrawal-delay report and the February incident show that reliability under stress is a concern. Access for anyone outside Korea is limited.

Why this scores a little below the midpoint: polished for its home market, but limited access, thin independent feedback and recent reliability scares.

Pros

  • Won market with a real-name bank account and a physical customer lounge
  • Familiar Korean-language experience for local users

Cons

  • Mostly unavailable to non-residents; foreign onboarding unconfirmed
  • No independent app rating found; reliability concerns in 2026

Bithumb says its customer centre runs 24 hours a day by phone, chat and online board, plus walk-in support, and that it handled about 10.48 million inquiries in 2025 with a 98.0% response rate (company-reported). Earlier company figures put complaint resolution at 94.3% in the first half of 2022 and 98.3% in the first half of 2023. In August 2026 it became the first domestic exchange to add real-time voice-to-text on phone support. After the February incident it announced compensation for affected customers, including paying customers who sold at low prices. We found no independent customer-satisfaction ratings, and because these are company statistics we weight them moderately.

Why this scores near the midpoint: unusually broad channels and a physical centre, but the figures are company-reported and no independent ratings were found.

Pros

  • 24-hour phone, chat and board support plus walk-in centre (company-reported)
  • Compensation scheme after the February 2026 error

Cons

  • Statistics are company-reported; no independent ratings found
  • Mostly Korean-language support

The extras are modest. Bithumb offers staking, a coupon system for fees, and a customer lounge, and it is pursuing the first stock-market listing of a Korean exchange: on August 3, 2026 it said it would finish internal readiness work in 2026, seek a preliminary listing review in 2027 and complete an IPO in 2028, after earlier plans for a Nasdaq listing in 2026 slipped. A shareholder noted it has paid dividends only once. Revenue is under pressure, with Upbit and Bithumb both reporting roughly 50% lower first-half 2026 revenue (The Block). We found no exchange token or launchpad.

Why this scores near the midpoint: a clear corporate roadmap and staking, but no token ecosystem and weaker financial momentum.

Pros

  • Staking and a coupon-based fee system
  • Published IPO roadmap with governance and accounting upgrades

Cons

  • No exchange token or launchpad found
  • First-half 2026 revenue down roughly 50% (reported)
Where to sign up

A cheap, domestic exchange, but weigh the 2026 ledger error, the record fine and the limited access outside Korea.

Bithumb suits Korean residents who want a low-fee won market and a long altcoin list. Check the live fee page, confirm that you can open an account, enable every security control, and keep long-term holdings in self-custody because we found no independent proof of reserves and the February 2026 error showed balances well beyond the exchange’s holdings.

0/ 100

Eighteenth of twenty-one: low fees and wide support channels, but a 620,000 BTC ledger error, a record AML fine and no independent proof of reserves.

Bithumb scores 55.5, just behind Gemini (57.25) and ahead of Binance.US (53.75), Bitrue (51.25) and HTX (45.5); it trails Kraken (74), Bitvavo (70), Coinbase (69.25), OKX (69), Crypto.com (67.75), Bybit and Gate (66), Upbit (64.5), Bitpanda (63.75), Binance (61.25), Bitget (59.5), Robinhood (59), Bitfinex (58.75), KuCoin (58.5), MEXC (58) and Bitstamp (57.75). It earns its marks on a reported 0.04% fee, cold-storage custody above the statutory ratio and broad support channels. It loses ground on the February 2026 ledger error, the record AML fine, the ownership questions, past hacks and domestic-only access. Revisit the score if Bithumb publishes independent reserve attestations or resolves the FIU case.

Best forKorean residents who want a low-fee won market and a long altcoin list
Not forNon-residents, derivatives traders, or holders who want independent proof of reserves
Score Ledger
bithumb exchange · 7 line items
01Security15.0
02Regulation9.0
03Fees12.0
04Coverage6.5
05Experience6.0
06Support4.5
07Ecosystem2.5
TOTAL55.5
≈ 56 / 100; Cheap, domestic, scarred record

The scorecard above is deliberately general. Whether Bithumb is right for you depends on where you live, whether you trade on the won market and how much weight you give its recent record.

Best fit

The Korean resident who trades altcoins in won

A reported 0.04% fee, a long coin list and a won market with a real-name bank account suit local spot traders.

Good fit

The fee-sensitive local trader who watches liquidity

Bithumb undercuts Upbit on paper, but check spreads, because Upbit’s deeper liquidity can cost less in practice.

Workable fit

The holder who accepts custody risk

Cold-storage claims and compensation history help, but the 2026 ledger error and the missing reserve attestation call for caution.

Poor fit

The non-resident or derivatives trader

Access is built around Korean residents and bank accounts, and we found no futures, margin or perpetuals.

These four tables cover the specifics we didn't want to bury in prose: the fee picture, the reserves and incident timeline, regulatory footprint, and how the exchanges in this series compare.

What Bithumb charges (and where sources conflict)

ItemMakerTakerSource note
Won market, flat rate0.04%0.04%Asia Economy (February 2024): applied to all assets, down from 0.25%; CoinMarketCap agrees
Won market, alternative reading0.25% (0.04% with coupon)0.25% (0.04% with coupon)SpotedCrypto and Asia Economy (August 2026) describe 0.04% as the coupon rate; unreconciled
BTC marketFreeFreeCoinMarketCap
Upbit base rate (for comparison)0.05%0.05%Asia Economy; SpotedCrypto adds 0.139% on stop-limit orders
Rival moves in 2026Coinone 0.04%; Korbit 0%Coinone 0.04%; Korbit 0%Asia Economy: Coinone from August 3; Korbit won market free for one year from August 24
Zero-fee campaign0%0%October 2023 to February 2024; ended February 5, 2024
BTC withdrawal0.001 BTC0.001 BTCSpotedCrypto; single comparison site
Won withdrawal1,000 won1,000 wonSpotedCrypto; single comparison site

We could not load Bithumb’s live fee page, only news reports and third-party summaries. Check current figures before trading.

Security, reserves and incident timeline

DateEventDetail
Feb 2017Reported theftAbout $7 million reported stolen by an unknown group
Jul 2017Staff-computer compromiseData on roughly 30,000 customers taken; follow-on scam thefts from some accounts
Jun 2018Hot-wallet theftAbout 35 billion won (around $31 million); Bithumb compensated users and moved funds to cold storage
Mar 2019Insider-linked lossAbout $13 million per FXStreet, near $20 million per Wikipedia; customer cold wallets reported unaffected
Feb 2023ISMS-P certificationInformation-security and privacy management certification from KISA
Feb 6, 2026620,000 BTC errorPayout unit entered as BTC instead of won for 249 winners; about 15 times actual holdings; 99.7% recovered, about 125 BTC unrecovered
Mar 16, 2026FIU sanction36.8 billion won fine, six-month partial suspension for new customers, CEO reprimand; court later stayed the suspension
Jun 2026Data-transfer fineAbout $136,000 for sending user data overseas
Aug 2026Withdrawal delays13-hour altcoin delays reported by one outlet; Bithumb cited cold-to-hot transfers; FSS reportedly reviewing
To dateReservesNo independent proof of reserves found; Korean law requires at least 80% cold storage

The February 2017 and August 2026 items each rest on a single outlet, and the 2019 amount differs by source.

Where Bithumb stands with regulators

AreaStatus
CompanyBithumb, Seoul; founded 2014; second-largest Korean exchange
SupervisionFinancial Services Commission and its Financial Intelligence Unit; FIU-registered virtual asset operator per SpotedCrypto
BankingWon market via a real-name account at KB Kookmin Bank (changed from NH Nonghyup in March 2025)
SanctionsMarch 2026 FIU fine, suspension stayed by court; June 2026 data fine; FSS investigation after the February error
OwnershipBithumb Holdings holds about 73.56%; Bucket Studio reaches about 30% of the holding company; Kiwoom Securities reported in talks
ListingIPO targeted for 2028 with a preliminary review in 2027
Not servedNon-resident access unconfirmed

Regulatory status and ownership can change quickly. Confirm current details with the Korean authorities and the company.

Series 10 so far

BinanceKrakenCoinbaseGateOKXBybitMEXCHTXBitfinexBitgetCrypto.comBitrueBinance.USKuCoinBitstampGeminiUpbitBitvavoBitpandaRobinhoodBithumb
Security (30)5.58.07.56.57.56.56.04.55.55.07.04.54.56.56.06.56.57.06.06.05.0
Regulation (20)4.08.58.56.56.06.53.02.04.55.58.03.55.03.58.07.06.58.07.07.04.5
Fees (15)8.56.04.57.07.57.08.05.59.06.55.56.59.06.55.04.08.57.05.04.58.0
Coverage (10)9.58.07.59.58.08.09.58.06.58.58.08.05.59.05.05.56.57.08.55.56.5
Experience (10)7.07.58.07.07.57.57.06.56.57.57.57.07.07.06.07.07.08.08.08.06.0
Support (10)3.54.53.02.53.53.52.02.03.03.52.52.52.02.53.02.03.04.54.03.04.5
Ecosystem (5)8.08.09.08.08.58.07.06.57.58.59.07.04.57.54.56.55.56.07.57.55.0
Our score61.25/10074/10069.25/10066/10069/10066/10058/10045.5/10058.75/10059.5/10067.75/10051.25/10053.75/10058.5/10057.75/10057.25/10064.5/10070/10063.75/10059/10055.5/100

Category scores are out of 10 and weighted as shown, taken from each review in this series.

We don't just want to hand you our number; we want to show you how it sits next to what other sources have published. Round-ups credit the low fees, but security and regulatory commentary is harsh, and our score lands above the blended figure.

The Block Note (us)N/A / 100
Industry averageN/A / 100

Our score lands above the aggregated figure, because critical security and regulatory commentary after the February error and the FIU sanction pulls the blend down, while our scorecard also credits the low fees, the cold-storage standards and the compensation that made customers whole.

SourceScoreType

Scores compiled by our editorial team from publicly available reviews as of November 2026. "Estimate" means the source didn't publish a single numeric score, so we converted its published verdict and sentiment into a comparable 100-point figure. Verify current figures directly with each source before citing them elsewhere.

Bithumb is supervised in South Korea by the Financial Services Commission and its Financial Intelligence Unit and says it holds customer assets in cold wallets above the statutory ratio. Its record is mixed: four reported security incidents between 2017 and 2019, a February 2026 error that credited 620,000 BTC it did not hold, and a record AML fine in March 2026. Customers were compensated each time we found, but we found no independent proof of reserves.

On February 6, 2026 an employee entered the payout unit as BTC instead of won during a promotion, crediting 249 winners with 620,000 BTC against actual holdings of roughly 40,000 BTC. Some recipients sold, the Bitcoin price on Bithumb briefly fell, and Bithumb said it recovered 99.7% of the mis-credited coins, with about 125 BTC unrecovered, and compensated affected customers.

On March 16, 2026 the FIU fined Bithumb 36.8 billion won, about $24 million and the largest fine on a Korean exchange, for AML and know-your-customer violations including 45,772 transfers with 18 unregistered overseas operators. It also ordered a six-month partial suspension of external transfers for new customers, reprimanded the CEO and suspended the reporting officer for six months. A Seoul court later stayed the suspension pending a final ruling.

Reports put the won-market fee at 0.04% maker and taker, with the BTC market free, and Asia Economy said the 0.04% rate applied to all assets from February 2024. SpotedCrypto and an August 2026 article instead describe 0.04% as the coupon rate against a 0.25% standard rate. We could not reconcile the two, so check the live fee page.

Bithumb is built for Korean residents. The won market needs a Korean real-name bank account, reportedly at KB Kookmin Bank, and the service and support are Korean-language first. We could not confirm how or whether non-residents can open an account, so check Bithumb directly before planning to use it.

We found no futures, margin or perpetuals on Bithumb, which is typical for a domestic Korean exchange. It offers spot markets in won, BTC and stablecoins, plus staking.

On August 3, 2026 Bithumb said it expects to request a preliminary listing review in 2027 and complete an IPO in 2028, after internal controls and accounting upgrades. Earlier plans for a 2026 Nasdaq listing slipped. Kiwoom Securities was reported in June 2026 to be negotiating a stake, with no terms agreed.

Bithumb scores 55.5 against Upbit’s 64.5. Bithumb has a slightly lower base fee and a longer altcoin list, but Upbit has deeper liquidity and a larger share (about 60% against 32% of trading value in June 2026). Neither record is clean, since Upbit has its own AML penalty and a hack in its history. Both are domestic Korean exchanges aimed at residents.

Editorial disclosure: This page may contain affiliate or referral links, and we may earn a commission if you sign up through one. That relationship never influences a score: scores are set by our editorial methodology before any review is published, and no company pays us for coverage or can change a result. Centralized exchanges carry real, structural risk regardless of which one you use, including custody, hack, insider, insolvency and regulatory risk. Nothing here is financial or investment advice.
Facts, fees and licence details verified against public sources as of Nov 10, 2026; Bithumb's fees, reserves, licences and availability change, so always confirm them directly with Bithumb and your local regulator.

More Reviews

Upbit – CEX Review

Upbit Exchange Review: Scored Out of 100 (November 2026) | The Block Note The Block Note Scorecard Sign up Verdict Details vs. Market FAQ...

Read More

CoinSpot – CEX Review

CoinSpot Exchange Review: Scored Out of 100 (November 2026) | The Block Note The Block Note Scorecard Sign up Verdict Details vs. Market FAQ...

Read More
binance exchange profile banner

Binance – CEX Review

Binance leads centralized crypto exchanges with high liquidity, low fees, and vast token support; setting the benchmark for speed, security, and global access.

Read More

Bitvavo – CEX Review

Bitvavo Exchange Review: Scored Out of 100 (November 2026) | The Block Note The Block Note Scorecard Sign up Verdict Details vs. Market FAQ...

Read More