BingX review: a feature-rich copy-trading exchange with competitive fees, a 2024 hot-wallet theft and a brand-new, unlaunched MiCA licence.
Twenty-second in our Crypto Centralized Exchanges series. BingX, founded in 2018, offers a broad coin list, perpetual futures, copy trading and a TradFi market, with 0.10% spot and 0.02% / 0.05% futures fees at the base tier and monthly Proof of Reserves (company-reported). It also lost an estimated $26.7 million to $52 million in a September 2024 hot-wallet theft, received an Austrian MiCA authorisation only on October 13, 2026 with no EU launch date, has been warned by regulators, is blocked in the US, UK and Canada, and is rated about 1.5 out of 5 on Trustpilot. We weighted all of it.
Our take, up front: BingX, founded in 2018, is an offshore derivatives-and-copy-trading exchange with a broad coin list, a TradFi market, competitive fees (0.10% spot, 0.02% / 0.05% futures at the base tier) and a monthly Proof of Reserves with ratios above 124% on four assets (company-reported). The weaknesses are plain: a hot-wallet theft estimated between $26.7 million and $52 million in September 2024, an Austrian MiCA authorisation granted only on October 13, 2026 with no EU launch date, past regulator warnings, access blocked in the US, UK and Canada, and public ratings of about 1.5 out of 5 on Trustpilot. We score it 59.25, twelfth of twenty-two: just below Bitget and above Robinhood Crypto.
BingX publishes a Proof of Reserves page with monthly Merkle-tree snapshots. Its July 15, 2026 report listed reserve ratios of 142.82% for BTC, 126.48% for ETH, 131.83% for USDT and 124.41% for USDC (company-reported), and users can check their own balance against the tree for BTC, ETH and USDT. That coverage is narrower than the full asset list, and we could not confirm an independent auditor behind it. The July 2026 Trust Center also cites a $150 million Shield Fund, PCI DSS 4.0.1 and ISO/IEC 27001 certifications, multi-signature withdrawals and a tiered cold, warm and hot wallet design (all company-reported). The incident record is the counterweight. On September 20, 2024 attackers drained hot wallets across several chains. Estimates of the loss ranged from an early $26.7 million (PeckShield) to about $43 million to $44.7 million (PeckShield, QuillAudits), more than $47 million (SlowMist) and $52 million (Cyvers), so the figure is disputed. BingX called it a “minor asset loss,” moved funds to cold storage, froze about $10 million, restored withdrawals within roughly a day and said it covered all losses from its reserves. Halborn’s analysis argued that compromise across several chains suggests keys may have been held in one central repository, which is an outside inference rather than a confirmed finding. We found no later thefts in the sources we reviewed.
Pros
- Monthly Merkle-tree Proof of Reserves with ratios above 124% on four assets (company-reported)
- Customers made whole after the 2024 breach; funds partly frozen and withdrawals restored within about a day
Cons
- September 2024 hot-wallet theft, estimated between $26.7M and $52M
- Reserve report covers only BTC, ETH, USDT and USDC; no independent auditor confirmed
BingX’s licensing is improving but still thin. Third-party summaries say BINGX GLOBAL PTY LTD is registered with Australia’s AUSTRAC as a digital currency exchange provider, and BINGX EU UAB is registered as a virtual asset service provider with Lithuania’s Financial Crime Investigation Service; both are registrations focused on anti-money-laundering controls, not MiCA authorisations or consumer-protection licences, and you should verify them on the registers. The major recent change is in Europe. BingX said on June 16, 2026 that its Austrian MiCA application was advanced but not granted, and the EU transition period ended on July 1, 2026. Austria’s FMA then authorised MEGE zweite GmbH, operating as BingX EU, to provide four crypto-asset services on October 13, 2026, announced on October 14. As of mid-October 2026 it did not yet appear in ESMA’s register, BingX had set no launch date for regulated EU services, and the authorisation covers that one Vienna entity rather than other BingX companies. Regulators have also warned about BingX in the past, including Belgium’s FSMA (June 2023) and Spain’s CNMV, and BingX is blocked in the US, UK and Canada among about 21 restricted jurisdictions (DataWallet; TradingFinder also lists the Netherlands). Corporate details are inconsistent: press releases are dated Panama City, while news outlets describe a Singapore-based exchange.
Pros
- Austrian MiCA authorisation for BingX EU granted October 13, 2026
- AUSTRAC and Lithuanian FCIS registrations reported by third parties
Cons
- MiCA services not launched; not on ESMA’s register as of mid-October 2026
- Past regulator warnings; blocked in the US, UK and Canada; unclear corporate base
BingX is competitively priced. Its own support pages and several comparison sites agree on a flat 0.10% maker and 0.10% taker rate on spot, with perpetual futures at 0.02% maker and 0.05% taker at the base tier. VIP tiers reduce these: DataWallet gives spot as low as 0.005% maker and 0.02% taker at the top tier, BingX’s own learn pages mention a 0.014% maker rate at advanced tiers, and coinperps lists futures VIP 5 at 0.006% maker and 0.03% taker, with the Supreme VIP tier at 0% maker and 0.028% taker. We could not reconcile the exact top-tier spot maker rate, so treat it as a range. Currency conversion carries a 0.2% fee (BingX support page). Perpetual funding rates apply, and a copy-trading profit share goes to lead traders, with one review citing 8% that we could not verify. There is a zero-fee demo account. We could not load the live fee schedule, so confirm current rates before trading.
Pros
- 0.10% spot and 0.02% / 0.05% futures at the base tier
- Zero-fee demo trading and published VIP tiers
Cons
- Top-tier spot maker rate differs between sources
- 0.2% conversion fee and copy-trading profit share add cost
Coverage is wide, though counts disagree. Sources give roughly 780 to more than 1,000 spot coins or pairs: DataWallet and coinperps cite 1,000+, BingX’s own comparison articles say 1,000+ in one and 900+ in another, TradingFinder says 800 and another review cites about 780 spot pairs. An older competitor-written page said about 200, which we excluded. Derivatives are the focus, with 254 to 380 perpetual contracts depending on source and a company-cited CoinGecko report crediting BingX with 565 new perpetual listings since 2025. Since January 2026 it has also offered a TradFi market with more than 100 stocks, indices, commodities and forex products, which the company says reached 50% of volume in the first quarter of 2026. Margin and leverage are available, staking exists and there are grid bots, though only three types according to FXEmpire. For EU customers, the regulated entity has not yet launched, so product access there is uncertain.
Pros
- Roughly 780 to 1,000+ spot coins and 250 to 380 perpetuals
- TradFi market with 100+ traditional assets
Cons
- Counts differ widely across sources
- EU product access depends on a regulated entity that has not yet launched
BingX is built around trading tools. Copy trading is the flagship, alongside a demo account, AI-assisted features, TradFi markets and, from Q2 2026, an upgraded TradingView integration (company-reported). Minimum deposits are low, with $1 cited by two sources, and card and P2P funding exist. The weak side shows up in user feedback on withdrawals and frozen accounts, and in verification-linked limits described by comparison sites. The interface is aimed at active traders, so it is denser than a beginner broker app.
Pros
- Copy trading, demo account and a TradingView upgrade
- Low minimums and several funding routes
Cons
- Dense interface aimed at active traders
- Frozen-account and withdrawal complaints in reviews
Public feedback is poor. Trustpilot shows a TrustScore of 1.5 out of 5 on about 733 reviews on the Irish page we saw, and Reviews.io shows 1.6 on roughly 660 to 680 reviews with only 8% of reviewers recommending it. Common complaints are frozen accounts, blocked withdrawals after verification, generic support replies and disputes about deleted PnL data. BingX replies to about 88% of negative Trustpilot reviews, typically within a week, and asks users to email support with their UID. Some reviewers praise fast Telegram or chat resolutions, and BingX says support runs 24 hours a day through live chat and email; one review site notes no phone support. These platforms attract disproportionately negative reviews and can include unverified claims, so we weight them moderately, and a cluster of September 2024 reviews comes from holders of the APES token demanding compensation after the hack.
Pros
- Replies to most negative reviews, typically within a week
- 24-hour live chat and email support (company-reported)
Cons
- Trustpilot about 1.5 out of 5 on roughly 733 reviews; Reviews.io 1.6
- Frozen-account and withdrawal complaints; no phone support
The ecosystem centres on social and AI trading. Copy trading is the headline, though its scale depends on the source: FXEmpire cites more than 2,000 traders to copy, Solana Compass says more than 15,000 strategy providers and 11 million copy relationships in mid-2026, and another review cites 100,000+ registered lead traders, so we treat these figures as unreconciled. BingX also offers AI tools launched in 2026, staking, a launchpool, and TradFi perpetuals. The company reports more than 40 million users (company-reported), is Chelsea FC’s principal partner and became Scuderia Ferrari HP’s first crypto exchange partner in 2026. One report alleges that an AI-trading partner, Trade4Me, lacks authorisation from major regulators and has drawn scam allegations, which we could not verify but which adds partner risk.
Pros
- Large copy-trading marketplace and AI trading tools
- Launchpool, staking and TradFi perpetuals
Cons
- Copy-trading scale figures disagree across sources
- One report alleges an AI-trading partner lacks authorisation
A feature-rich offshore exchange, but weigh the 2024 hack, the unlaunched MiCA licence and the poor public support ratings.
BingX suits active traders who want copy trading, perpetual futures and TradFi markets at low base fees and who accept offshore risk. Check the live fee page, confirm that BingX serves your country, treat copy trading as high risk, enable every security control, and keep long-term holdings in self-custody because the reserve report covers only four assets and we could not confirm an independent auditor.
Twelfth of twenty-two: low fees, broad products and published reserves, but a 2024 hot-wallet theft, a late and unlaunched MiCA licence and poor public support ratings.
BingX scores 59.25, just behind Bitget (59.5) and ahead of Robinhood Crypto (59), Bitfinex (58.75), KuCoin (58.5), MEXC (58), Bitstamp (57.75), Gemini (57.25), Bithumb (55.5), Binance.US (53.75), Bitrue (51.25) and HTX (45.5); it trails Kraken (74), Bitvavo (70), Coinbase (69.25), OKX (69), Crypto.com (67.75), Bybit and Gate (66), Upbit (64.5), Bitpanda (63.75) and Binance (61.25). It earns its marks on competitive fees, a wide product range, copy trading and monthly reserve reports. It loses ground on the 2024 breach, thin licensing outside Australia and Lithuania, a MiCA authorisation that has not yet launched, regulator warnings and poor public ratings. Revisit the score if BingX EU launches under its licence or if the reserve report adds an independent auditor and more assets.
The scorecard above is deliberately general. Whether BingX is right for you depends on where you live, how actively you trade and how much risk you accept from offshore licensing and support.
The active derivatives and copy trader
Low base fees, hundreds of perpetuals, copy trading and a demo account suit people who trade often and understand leverage.
The altcoin and TradFi explorer
A long coin list and a TradFi market with stocks, indices and commodities give variety in one account.
The holder who values published reserves
Monthly reserve ratios above 124% on four assets help, but the 2024 breach and limited auditor detail call for caution.
The US, UK or Canadian resident, or anyone needing strong support
Those countries are blocked, EU regulated services have not launched, and independent support ratings are poor.
These four tables cover the specifics we didn't want to bury in prose: the fee picture, the reserves and incident timeline, regulatory footprint, and how the exchanges in this series compare.
What BingX charges (and where sources conflict)
| Item | Maker | Taker | Source note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spot, base tier | 0.10% | 0.10% | BingX learn articles and several comparison sites agree |
| Spot, top VIP | 0.005% to 0.014% | 0.02% | DataWallet says 0.005%; BingX learn page mentions 0.014% at advanced tiers; unreconciled |
| Perpetual futures, base tier | 0.02% | 0.05% | BingX support page |
| Futures, VIP 5 | 0.006% | 0.03% | coinperps; over $200M volume and $3M assets |
| Futures, Supreme VIP | 0% | 0.028% | DataWallet and coinperps |
| Currency conversion | 0.2% | 0.2% | BingX support page |
| Copy-trading profit share | Unclear | 8% (one review) | One comparison site; not verified |
| Demo trading | None | None | Zero-fee simulated account |
We could not load BingX’s live fee schedule, only support articles and third-party summaries. Check current figures before trading.
Security, reserves and incident timeline
| Date | Event | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2023 | Regulator warnings | Belgium’s FSMA warning (June 8, 2023); Spain’s CNMV also warned about BingX |
| Sep 20, 2024 | Hot-wallet theft | Estimates from $26.7M (PeckShield, early) to $43M to $44.7M, over $47M (SlowMist) and $52M (Cyvers) |
| Sep 2024 | Response | Funds moved to cold storage; about $10M frozen; withdrawals restored in about a day; losses covered from reserves |
| Jun 16, 2026 | MiCA application update | BingX EU said its Austrian application was advanced but not granted |
| Jul 1, 2026 | MiCA transition ends | BingX not in ESMA’s CASP register at that point (DataWallet) |
| Jul 15, 2026 | Reserve report | BTC 142.82%, ETH 126.48%, USDT 131.83%, USDC 124.41% (company-reported) |
| Jul 29, 2026 | Trust Center | Cites a $150M Shield Fund, PCI DSS 4.0.1 and ISO/IEC 27001 (company-reported) |
| Oct 13, 2026 | FMA authorisation | MEGE zweite GmbH (BingX EU) authorised for four services; no launch date; not in ESMA register mid-October |
| To date | Later thefts | None found in the sources we reviewed |
Hack-loss figures vary by analyst, and the reserve ratios and certifications are company claims. Halborn’s key-storage conclusion is an outside inference.
Where BingX stands with regulators
| Region | Status |
|---|---|
| Company | BingX, founded 2018; press releases dated Panama City while media describe a Singapore-based exchange |
| Australia | BINGX GLOBAL PTY LTD registered with AUSTRAC as a digital currency exchange (per third-party summaries; verify on the register) |
| Lithuania | BINGX EU UAB registered with the FCIS as a virtual asset service provider; not a MiCA authorisation |
| Austria and EEA | MEGE zweite GmbH (BingX EU) MiCA authorisation from the FMA, October 13, 2026; covers one Vienna entity; no launch date |
| Blocked | US, UK, Canada, China and others; about 21 restricted jurisdictions (DataWallet); Netherlands also listed by TradingFinder |
| Warnings | Belgium FSMA and Spain CNMV warnings; BingX not FCA-authorised |
Regulatory status differs by entity and changes quickly. Confirm the entity that will serve you, and your location’s status, on the relevant register.
Series 10 so far
| Binance | Kraken | Coinbase | Gate | OKX | Bybit | MEXC | HTX | Bitfinex | Bitget | Crypto.com | Bitrue | Binance.US | KuCoin | Bitstamp | Gemini | Upbit | Bitvavo | Bitpanda | Robinhood | Bithumb | BingX | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Security (30) | 5.5 | 8.0 | 7.5 | 6.5 | 7.5 | 6.5 | 6.0 | 4.5 | 5.5 | 5.0 | 7.0 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 6.5 | 6.0 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 7.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 5.5 |
| Regulation (20) | 4.0 | 8.5 | 8.5 | 6.5 | 6.0 | 6.5 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 4.5 | 5.5 | 8.0 | 3.5 | 5.0 | 3.5 | 8.0 | 7.0 | 6.5 | 8.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 4.5 | 5.0 |
| Fees (15) | 8.5 | 6.0 | 4.5 | 7.0 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 8.0 | 5.5 | 9.0 | 6.5 | 5.5 | 6.5 | 9.0 | 6.5 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 8.5 | 7.0 | 5.0 | 4.5 | 8.0 | 7.0 |
| Coverage (10) | 9.5 | 8.0 | 7.5 | 9.5 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 9.5 | 8.0 | 6.5 | 8.5 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 5.5 | 9.0 | 5.0 | 5.5 | 6.5 | 7.0 | 8.5 | 5.5 | 6.5 | 8.5 |
| Experience (10) | 7.0 | 7.5 | 8.0 | 7.0 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 6.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 6.0 | 7.5 |
| Support (10) | 3.5 | 4.5 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 3.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 4.5 | 2.5 |
| Ecosystem (5) | 8.0 | 8.0 | 9.0 | 8.0 | 8.5 | 8.0 | 7.0 | 6.5 | 7.5 | 8.5 | 9.0 | 7.0 | 4.5 | 7.5 | 4.5 | 6.5 | 5.5 | 6.0 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 5.0 | 7.5 |
| Our score | 61.25/100 | 74/100 | 69.25/100 | 66/100 | 69/100 | 66/100 | 58/100 | 45.5/100 | 58.75/100 | 59.5/100 | 67.75/100 | 51.25/100 | 53.75/100 | 58.5/100 | 57.75/100 | 57.25/100 | 64.5/100 | 70/100 | 63.75/100 | 59/100 | 55.5/100 | 59.25/100 |
Category scores are out of 10 and weighted as shown, taken from each review in this series.
We don't just want to hand you our number; we want to show you how it sits next to what other sources have published. Round-ups like the products, but consumer ratings and regulatory commentary are harsh, and our score lands above the blended figure.
Our score lands above the aggregated figure, because the very low consumer ratings and cautious regulatory commentary pull the blend down, while our scorecard credits the competitive fees, the wide product range, the published reserves and the full coverage of the 2024 loss.
| Source | Score | Type |
|---|
Scores compiled by our editorial team from publicly available reviews as of November 2026. "Estimate" means the source didn't publish a single numeric score, so we converted its published verdict and sentiment into a comparable 100-point figure. Verify current figures directly with each source before citing them elsewhere.
BingX publishes monthly Proof of Reserves and says it covers losses from reserves, but it suffered a hot-wallet theft in September 2024 and has been the subject of regulator warnings. Its regulation is mostly AML registrations (AUSTRAC in Australia, Lithuania’s FCIS) plus an Austrian MiCA authorisation for BingX EU granted on October 13, 2026, so it is partly regulated rather than fully licensed in major markets.
Yes. On September 20, 2024 attackers drained hot wallets across several chains. Loss estimates ranged from about $26.7 million to $52 million depending on the analyst. BingX called it a minor loss, said it covered all losses from reserves, froze about $10 million and restored withdrawals within roughly a day.
Austria’s FMA authorised MEGE zweite GmbH, operating as BingX EU, to provide four crypto-asset services on October 13, 2026. As of mid-October 2026 it did not appear in ESMA’s register and BingX had not set a launch date for regulated services, and the authorisation covers that entity only.
The base tier charges 0.10% maker and taker on spot and 0.02% maker and 0.05% taker on perpetual futures. VIP tiers reduce these, with a 0.2% fee on currency conversion. Sources disagree on the exact top-tier spot maker rate, so check the live fee schedule.
Yes, BingX publishes a Merkle-tree Proof of Reserves monthly. Its July 15, 2026 report listed ratios of 142.82% for BTC, 126.48% for ETH, 131.83% for USDT and 124.41% for USDC (company-reported). Users can verify balances for BTC, ETH and USDT, and we could not confirm an independent auditor.
No. BingX is blocked in the US, UK and Canada among about 21 restricted jurisdictions, and one source also lists the Netherlands. The restricted list changes, so check BingX’s own disclaimer for your country.
Copy trading lets users automatically replicate the spot and futures positions of lead traders. Reported scale varies widely, from more than 2,000 traders to 15,000 strategy providers or 100,000 registered lead traders, so treat the size claims cautiously. Past performance of lead traders does not guarantee returns.
BingX scores 59.25 against Bybit’s 66. BingX is similar on fees and stronger on copy trading and TradFi markets, but it scores lower on security and regulation in our scorecard because of the 2024 hot-wallet theft, the late MiCA authorisation and weaker public ratings.
More Reviews
Upbit – CEX Review
Upbit Exchange Review: Scored Out of 100 (November 2026) | The Block Note The Block Note Scorecard Sign up Verdict Details vs. Market FAQ...
Read MoreCoinSpot – CEX Review
CoinSpot Exchange Review: Scored Out of 100 (November 2026) | The Block Note The Block Note Scorecard Sign up Verdict Details vs. Market FAQ...
Read MoreBinance – CEX Review
Binance leads centralized crypto exchanges with high liquidity, low fees, and vast token support; setting the benchmark for speed, security, and global access.
Read MoreBitvavo – CEX Review
Bitvavo Exchange Review: Scored Out of 100 (November 2026) | The Block Note The Block Note Scorecard Sign up Verdict Details vs. Market FAQ...
Read More
