SafePal S1 Pro:
the same core security as the S1, in a genuinely better body, for $40 more.
We tore apart SafePal's premium air-gapped hardware wallet across seven weighted categories; from a real aluminum-and-tempered-glass upgrade over the S1's plastic build, a larger 500 mAh battery, and a more ergonomically placed camera for faster QR scanning, to the exact same core secure element, air-gapped signing architecture, and unresolved company-level transparency concerns we found reviewing the cheaper S1; and landed on a score the marketing page won't show you.
Our take, up front: the S1 Pro is best understood as the S1 we reviewed earlier in this series, rebuilt in better materials. It keeps the identical EAL6+ certified secure element, the same fully air-gapped QR-code signing architecture, no Bluetooth, WiFi, NFC, or USB data connection at all, and the same broad SafePal app ecosystem. What's genuinely different: an aluminum alloy and tempered glass body replaces the S1's plastic, independently described as the most durable and premium device in SafePal's lineup, a larger 500 mAh battery (versus 400 mAh), and a more ergonomically placed camera specifically for faster QR scanning. At $89.99, that's a real $40 premium over the S1 for build quality and battery life, not additional security. The same real, unresolved company-level concerns we found reviewing the S1 remain just as relevant here: the 2021 Kraken Security Labs disclosure and the apparently-still-unresolved GPL open-source licensing violation are company-wide context that a better-built enclosure doesn't change. We weighted all of it below.
The S1 Pro carries the identical EAL6+ certified secure element found in the S1, with the same tamper-detection sensors and fully air-gapped design: no Bluetooth, WiFi, NFC, or USB data connection of any kind, only QR-code signing between the device's camera, screen, and your phone. The same real, adversarial 2021 Kraken Security Labs disclosure applies as company-level context: the core secure element resisted extraction despite "multiple attempts and angles," a genuine positive, but Kraken also confirmed a working firmware downgrade attack (since patched in firmware V1.0.24) and disputed the effectiveness of the tamper-detection mechanism, which SafePal pushed back on as an EMC-compliance component rather than a core security feature. Most significantly, the same real, apparently still-unresolved GPL open-source license violation established in our review of the S1, where SafePal has not released legally-required source code for GPL-licensed components running on its devices, remains relevant, unresolved context here too, since it concerns the company's broader hardware security posture rather than one specific unit.
Pros
- Same EAL6+ certified secure element and tamper-detection sensors as the S1
- Fully air-gapped design with no wireless or USB-data attack surface
- Core secure element resisted extraction under real, adversarial third-party testing
Cons
- Same real, apparently still-unresolved GPL open-source license violation as the S1
- Same historical, since-patched firmware downgrade vulnerability disclosed in 2021
The S1 Pro shares the same broad ecosystem as the S1: 200-plus supported blockchains, NFT and DeFi access, and SafePal Earn for staking and yield aggregation across networks, protocols, and risk ratings. WalletConnect enables DApp connectivity. Real, notable ecosystem-wide gap: there's no native desktop application for Windows, macOS, or Linux, only a browser extension.
Pros
- 200-plus supported blockchains, matching the S1
- SafePal Earn staking and yield aggregation built into the app
Cons
- No native desktop application; browser extension only
A real, specific improvement over the S1: a more ergonomically placed camera enables faster QR scanning, a genuine day-to-day usability upgrade. The same 1.3-inch color display and 5-button D-pad carry over, "though with a slightly different feel" per one detailed source. The same real learning curve applies: new users independently describe the back-and-forth QR-code workflow as awkward compared to USB or Bluetooth-based signing.
Pros
- More ergonomically placed camera for genuinely faster QR scanning than the S1
- Same clear, easy-to-read 1.3" color display
Cons
- Same QR-code back-and-forth workflow independently described as awkward for new users
This is genuinely where the S1 Pro earns its price. Aluminum alloy and tempered glass replace the S1's plastic ABS/PVC construction, independently described as feeling "the most durable and premium" across SafePal's entire lineup. A larger 500 mAh battery (versus the S1's 400 mAh) is a real, meaningful capacity upgrade.
Pros
- Aluminum alloy and tempered glass construction, independently the most premium in SafePal's lineup
- Larger 500 mAh battery versus the S1's 400 mAh
Cons
- None significant found in our research
Real, substantial institutional backing carries over from SafePal's broader company profile, including Binance Labs, and a large, real user base across software and hardware. The same real, apparently-unresolved GPL licensing concern and the 2021 Kraken Security Labs disclosure history documented in our review of the S1 remain relevant, unresolved company context for this device too.
Pros
- Real institutional backing from Binance Labs
Cons
- Same unresolved GPL licensing concern documented at the company level
At $89.99, this is a real $40 premium over the S1, independently described as "worth the extra $20 or $40... for many" specifically for the build quality and battery improvements. It remains meaningfully cheaper than premium competitors like the Ledger Nano X or Trezor Safe 5, which often cost two to three times as much. No subscription fee.
Pros
- Meaningfully cheaper than premium competitors like Ledger Nano X or Trezor Safe 5
- Real, genuine build and battery improvements over the S1
Cons
- The $40 premium over the S1 buys build quality, not additional security
The same included mnemonic phrase cards and the separately-sold Cypher Seed Board metal backup option carry over from the S1. SafePal Earn gives real, built-in access to staking and yield opportunities across multiple networks and protocols directly from the app.
Pros
- Optional Cypher Seed Board metal backup plate available
- Real, built-in SafePal Earn staking and yield access
Cons
- None significant found in our research
Buy only through SafePal's official store.
Third-party marketplace listings are a real, documented vector for tampered devices. Buying direct is the only way to be confident your unit hasn't been modified before it reached you.
A genuine materials upgrade over the S1, carrying the same real trust questions.
Judged purely on build, the S1 Pro earns its premium: real aluminum and tempered glass instead of plastic, a meaningfully larger battery, and a camera placement specifically improved for faster scanning. None of that is marketing fluff, it's a genuine, tangible upgrade over the S1. What doesn't change is the part that matters most for a security device: the identical secure element, the identical air-gapped signing architecture, and the same real, still-unresolved GPL licensing concern we found reviewing the cheaper S1. If you already trust SafePal's security model enough to buy the S1, the Pro is a reasonable, honest upgrade for anyone who specifically wants better materials and battery life. If you're undecided on SafePal specifically, the Pro doesn't change that calculus at all, since the actual security question is identical either way.
The scorecard above is deliberately general. Whether the SafePal S1 Pro is right for you depends heavily on which of these you already are.
The buyer who wants the S1's security in genuinely better materials
Aluminum alloy, tempered glass, and a larger battery are real, tangible upgrades if you already trust SafePal's underlying security model.
The frequent signer who wants faster QR scanning specifically
The more ergonomically placed camera is a real, genuine day-to-day improvement over the S1 for anyone signing transactions regularly.
The buyer who values durability over the lowest possible price
If a $40 premium for a genuinely more durable, premium build is worth it to you, this is a reasonable step up from the S1.
Anyone still deciding whether to trust SafePal's security model at all
The Pro's security is identical to the cheaper S1; if you're unsure about SafePal specifically, start there instead of paying more for the same trust question.
The scorecard covers the headline judgment calls. These four tables cover the specifics we didn't want to bury in prose; SafePal's full three-device lineup side by side, exactly what the extra $40 over the S1 buys, the company-level context that carries over unchanged, and how it compares against the other wallets we've reviewed.
SafePal's full lineup: S1, X1, and S1 Pro
| S1 | X1 | S1 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $49.99 | $69.99 | $89.99 |
| Signing method | QR code (air-gapped) | Bluetooth (not air-gapped) | QR code (air-gapped) |
| Secure element | EAL6+ | EAL5+ | EAL6+ |
| Build material | Plastic (ABS/PVC) | Plastic | Aluminum alloy + tempered glass |
| Battery | 400 mAh | Not specified | 500 mAh |
Of the three, the S1 Pro is the only model that upgrades materials and battery while keeping the exact same core security architecture as its cheaper sibling.
What the extra $40 over the S1 actually buys
| SafePal S1 ($49.99) | SafePal S1 Pro ($89.99) | |
|---|---|---|
| Secure element | EAL6+ | EAL6+ — identical |
| Signing method | QR code, fully air-gapped | QR code, fully air-gapped — identical |
| Build material | Plastic (ABS/PVC) | Aluminum alloy + tempered glass |
| Battery | 400 mAh | 500 mAh |
| Camera placement | Standard | Optimized for faster scanning |
Every real difference between these two devices is about materials, battery, and ergonomics; the security model protecting your funds is identical.
Company-level context that carries over unchanged
| Concern | Status |
|---|---|
| 2021 Kraken Security Labs disclosure | Firmware downgrade attack confirmed (since patched); tamper-detection bypass disputed by SafePal |
| GPL open-source license violation | Apparently still unresolved, per the most recent independent source we found |
| Core secure element resistance | Resisted extraction under real, adversarial third-party testing |
These are company-level, not device-specific, findings; a better-built enclosure on the Pro doesn't change SafePal's underlying transparency track record.
How it compares to other hardware wallets we've reviewed
| Wallet | Build | Secure element | Price | Notable trade-off |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SafePal S1 Pro | Aluminum + tempered glass | EAL6+ | $89.99 | Same unresolved GPL concern as the cheaper S1 |
| SafePal S1 | Plastic | EAL6+ | $49.99 | Same core security for $40 less |
| Keystone 3 Pro | Metal frame | 3x Infineon (open-source) | $149 | Two-scan QR workflow; no native staking |
| Trezor Safe 3 | Plastic | EAL6+ (open-source) | $59 | Disclosed, unpatchable microcontroller vulnerability |
Against premium competitors, the S1 Pro remains meaningfully cheaper while sharing the same real, unresolved transparency question found across SafePal's whole lineup.
We don't just want to hand you our number; we want to show you how it sits next to what other review desks and comparison sites have published. Most coverage frames the S1 Pro straightforwardly as "the S1 with a better build" without directly revisiting the 2021 Kraken disclosure or the GPL licensing concern in the specific context of this device.
Our score lands meaningfully below the aggregated industry average; most sources focus on the genuine build and battery upgrades without re-weighting the same unresolved company-level transparency concern we carried forward from our review of the S1.
| Source | Score | Type |
|---|
Scores compiled by our editorial team from publicly available reviews as of August 2026. "Editorial estimate" means the outlet didn't publish a single numeric score, so we converted their published verdict and sentiment into a comparable 100-point figure. Verify current figures directly with each source before citing them elsewhere.
No. Both use the identical EAL6+ certified secure element and the same fully air-gapped QR-code signing architecture. The Pro's $40 premium buys build materials and battery life, not additional security.
Aluminum alloy and tempered glass replace the S1's plastic ABS/PVC construction, independently described as the most durable and premium device in SafePal's lineup. It also includes a larger 500 mAh battery versus the S1's 400 mAh.
The original findings concerned the S1 specifically, but they reflect SafePal's broader company-level security architecture and transparency practices, which we treat as relevant context for the Pro too, since it shares the same core secure element and firmware model.
We found no evidence it's been resolved company-wide. This is a company-level transparency concern rather than something specific to one device's hardware revision.
Yes. Unlike the Bluetooth-based X1, the S1 Pro uses the same fully air-gapped QR-code signing method as the S1, with no Bluetooth, WiFi, NFC, or USB data connection at all.
If you're deciding whether to trust SafePal's security model at all, start with the cheaper S1, since the underlying security is identical. Choose the Pro specifically if premium materials and a larger battery are worth $40 more to you.
It's more ergonomically placed than on the S1, enabling genuinely faster QR-code scanning during the signing workflow, a real, specific usability improvement.
Only through SafePal's own official store. Third-party marketplace listings are a real, documented risk for tampered devices across this entire category.
More Reviews
BitBox02 – Hardware Wallet Review
Score: 71/100. Swiss-made, open-source, and genuinely clever, but sources disagree on whether multisig still works.
Read More
Ledger Flex – Hardware Wallet Review
Score: 76/100. Best chip Ledger makes, but closed-source firmware, the Recover controversy, and two breaches still linger.
Read More
NGrave Zero – Hardware Wallet Review
Score: 62/100. The "EAL7 wallet" is real, but the actual secure element underneath is a lower EAL5+ chip.
Read More
Trezor Safe 7 – Hardware Wallet Review
Score: 78/100. Fully auditable TROPIC01 chip, undercut by a real Ledger Donjon laser fault-injection disclosure.
Read More