SafePal S1:
$49.99 for a fully air-gapped design, and a five-year-old open-source promise still unkept.
We tore apart SafePal's budget QR-signing hardware wallet across seven weighted categories; from a genuinely thorough air-gapped design with no Bluetooth, WiFi, NFC, or USB data connection at all, and a secure element that resisted extraction under real, adversarial testing, to a technically-confirmed 2021 firmware downgrade vulnerability (since patched) and an apparently still-unresolved GPL open-source license violation an independent source reconfirmed as recently as December 2025; and landed on a score the marketing page won't show you.
Our take, up front: at $49.99, the SafePal S1 is genuinely one of the most affordable ways to get real hardware-backed self-custody in this entire series, delivering a certified EAL6+ secure element and a fully air-gapped design, no Bluetooth, WiFi, NFC, or USB data connection of any kind, through a QR-code signing workflow instead. Backed by Binance Labs and used by a genuinely large real user base, the company has real credibility. In February 2021, Kraken Security Labs published a detailed security disclosure: the core secure element resisted extraction despite "multiple attempts and angles," a real, meaningful positive, but Kraken also confirmed a working firmware downgrade attack (since patched) and disputed tamper-detection effectiveness (which SafePal pushed back on as an EMC-compliance component, not a core security feature). The more serious, lingering issue: Kraken found the device contains GPL-licensed open-source components that legally require SafePal to release the corresponding source code, and SafePal refused. An independent source reconfirmed as recently as December 2025 that this violation remains unresolved, nearly five years after the company said it intended to release the code in 2021. We weighted all of it below.
The S1 uses a certified EAL6+ secure element with tamper-detection sensors, inside a fully air-gapped design: no Bluetooth, WiFi, NFC, or USB data connection exists at all, only a QR-code signing workflow between the device's camera, screen, and your phone. In February 2021, Kraken Security Labs published a detailed, adversarial security disclosure. The genuinely reassuring part: despite "multiple attempts and angles," Kraken was not able to steal cryptocurrency or extract the seed from the core secure element. The more concerning parts: Kraken demonstrated a working firmware downgrade attack, flashing the device back to an older, potentially vulnerable firmware version without detection, which SafePal subsequently patched in firmware v1.0.24; and Kraken bypassed the device's tamper-detection mechanism by removing an RF shield, which SafePal disputes is a core security feature, characterizing it instead as a component required for electromagnetic compliance rather than security. The most serious, lingering issue: the device contains GPL-licensed open-source components (U-Boot and the Linux kernel) that legally obligate SafePal to release corresponding source code on request; SafePal refused Kraken's request in 2021, stated it intended to release the code that year, and an independent source reconfirmed as recently as December 2025 that this violation remains unresolved nearly five years later.
Pros
- Core secure element resisted extraction under real, adversarial third-party testing
- Fully air-gapped design with no wireless or USB-data attack surface at all
- The confirmed firmware downgrade vulnerability was patched
Cons
- A real, confirmed firmware downgrade attack existed prior to patching
- Apparently still-unresolved GPL open-source license violation, reconfirmed as recently as December 2025
- Closed-source firmware beyond the specific GPL-covered components
The S1 supports 200-plus blockchains, with NFT, DeFi, and DApp access available directly through the SafePal App, genuinely competitive coverage for a device at this price point.
Pros
- 200-plus supported blockchains
- NFT, DeFi, and DApp access through the companion app
Cons
- None significant found in our research
The QR-code workflow, build a transaction on your phone, scan it to the device, verify on-screen, sign, scan the signed result back, is a real, functional air-gapped interaction method. But at least one detailed reviewer describes the D-pad navigation as "noticeably slower and less intuitive" than touchscreen competitors like the Trezor Safe 5 or ELLIPAL Titan, with scrolling through long addresses or menus requiring real patience.
Pros
- Functional, genuinely air-gapped QR-code signing workflow
- 1.3" full-color IPS screen for on-device verification
Cons
- D-pad navigation independently described as slower and less intuitive than touchscreen competitors
- Long addresses and menus require real patience to navigate
The S1 uses a plastic ABS and PVC construction, explicitly more basic than the S1 Pro's aluminum alloy and tempered-glass build. Real, independently-documented complaints describe the small screen as scratching easily and the battery self-discharging during storage. A genuine, distinctive positive: the 400 mAh battery can be recharged via USB-C or supplemented with standard AAA batteries, real flexibility most competitors don't offer.
Pros
- Real, distinctive dual power-source flexibility (AAA batteries or USB-C)
Cons
- Basic ABS/PVC plastic construction
- Screen independently reported to scratch easily
- Battery reportedly self-discharges during storage
SafePal is genuinely backed by Binance Labs, and the company reports a real, large user base of 20 to 25 million people across its software and hardware products. SafePal responded reasonably quickly to Kraken's 2021 disclosure, patching the confirmed downgrade vulnerability. But the apparently still-unresolved GPL license violation, independently reconfirmed as recently as December 2025, nearly five years after SafePal said it intended to release the required source code, is a genuine, ongoing reliability and transparency concern.
Pros
- Real institutional backing from Binance Labs
- Large, real user base (20-25 million across software and hardware)
- Responded reasonably quickly to patch the 2021 downgrade vulnerability
Cons
- Apparently still-unresolved GPL license violation, nearly five years after promising to resolve it
At $49.99, this is genuinely one of the most affordable hardware wallets in this entire series, delivering a certified EAL6+ secure element and a fully air-gapped design well below what most direct competitors charge for comparable core security architecture. No subscription fee.
Pros
- One of the lowest prices in this entire series for genuine air-gapped, EAL6+ security
- No subscription fee
Cons
- None significant found in our research
Three included mnemonic phrase cards give buyers a real, immediate way to record their seed phrase. A separately-sold "Cypher Seed Board," a metal plate for engraving the seed phrase against fire, water, and corrosion, is a real, genuine durable backup option. Dual power-source flexibility (AAA batteries or USB-C) is itself a real, distinctive extra.
Pros
- Optional Cypher Seed Board metal backup plate available
- Dual power-source flexibility (AAA or USB-C)
Cons
- None significant found in our research
Buy only through SafePal's official store.
Third-party marketplace listings are a real, documented vector for tampered devices. Buying direct is the only way to be confident your unit hasn't been modified before it reached you.
Real budget security, with a five-year-old promise still unkept.
The core of what the S1 promises genuinely holds up: a fully air-gapped design, a secure element that resisted extraction under real adversarial testing, and hardware-backed self-custody at a price most competitors can't match. That's real, substantive value. What keeps this from scoring higher isn't a single dramatic failure, it's an accumulation of smaller, real, honestly-documented issues: a confirmed (if patched) downgrade vulnerability, a plastic build with independently-reported screen and battery complaints, and most notably, an open-source licensing violation the company said it would fix in 2021 and, per the most recent independent check we found, still hasn't. None of this means your funds are at risk today. It does mean a company that markets itself partly on transparency has a real, specific, multi-year gap between what it promised and what it delivered.
The scorecard above is deliberately general. Whether the SafePal S1 is right for you depends heavily on which of these you already are.
The budget-conscious buyer who wants genuine air-gapped isolation
A fully air-gapped design with no wireless attack surface at all, for under $50, is a real, distinctive value proposition most competitors can't match at this price.
The multi-chain holder who wants broad support without paying a premium
200-plus supported blockchains at a budget price point covers most mainstream holdings without needing a pricier device.
The occasional user who doesn't mind a slower, D-pad-based interface
If you're not signing transactions daily, the more basic navigation and QR-scanning workflow are a manageable trade-off for the price.
Anyone who specifically prioritizes verified, fully open-source transparency
The apparently still-unresolved GPL license violation is a real, disqualifying factor if independently verifiable code is a hard requirement for you.
The scorecard covers the headline judgment calls. These four tables cover the specifics we didn't want to bury in prose; the 2021 Kraken disclosure in plain terms, the GPL violation timeline and its current status, SafePal's own lineup, and how it compares against the other wallets we've reviewed.
The 2021 Kraken Security Labs disclosure, in plain terms
| Finding | Outcome |
|---|---|
| Seed/key extraction | Not achieved despite "multiple attempts and angles," per Kraken's own report |
| Firmware downgrade attack | Confirmed working; SafePal patched it in firmware v1.0.24 |
| Tamper-detection bypass | Confirmed by Kraken; SafePal disputes it as a core security issue, calling the affected component an EMC-compliance requirement |
| GPL license violation | Confirmed; SafePal refused to release legally-required source code |
Disclosed to SafePal on November 18, 2020; published publicly by Kraken on February 16, 2021.
The GPL violation: promised fix vs. current status
| Date | Status |
|---|---|
| February 2021 | Kraken publishes the finding; SafePal states it "intend[s] to release source code in 2021" |
| 2021 (later) | No source code release found by independent trackers |
| December 2025 | WalletScrutiny, an independent source, reconfirms the violation remains unresolved |
| Today | No evidence found of SafePal releasing the GPL-required source code |
This is a legal compliance question, not just a security one: GPLv2 licensing legally requires source code to be made available for the licensed components (U-Boot and the Linux kernel) running on the device.
SafePal's own lineup
| Device | Price | Connectivity | Build |
|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | $49.99 | Fully air-gapped (QR only) | ABS + PVC plastic, 400 mAh battery |
| X1 | Not specified in sources reviewed | Bluetooth-enabled | ABS + tempered glass |
| S1 Pro | $89.99 | Fully air-gapped (QR only) | Aluminum alloy + tempered glass, 500 mAh battery |
Choose the S1 Pro over the S1 specifically for the more premium build; choose the X1 only if Bluetooth convenience matters more to you than strict air-gapped signing.
How it compares to other hardware wallets we've reviewed
| Wallet | Price | Air-gapped? | Notable trade-off |
|---|---|---|---|
| SafePal S1 | $49.99 | Yes, fully | Confirmed (patched) downgrade flaw; apparently unresolved GPL violation |
| Trezor Safe 3 | $59 | No | Disclosed, unpatchable microcontroller vulnerability |
| Tangem Wallet | $54.90-$69.90 | N/A (NFC card) | Unpatchable disclosed laser attack |
| Coldcard MK4 | $148-$178 | Yes, fully | Active advisory; $100M+ in confirmed real-world theft |
At $49.99, the S1 is among the cheapest devices in this entire series; its real, ongoing issue is a licensing and transparency gap rather than a confirmed loss of funds.
We don't just want to hand you our number; we want to show you how it sits next to what other review desks and comparison sites have published. Most coverage leads with the genuine air-gap and value story, and several sources mention the 2021 Kraken disclosure only briefly as historical context rather than as an ongoing concern.
Our score lands meaningfully below the aggregated industry average; most sources treat the 2021 Kraken findings as resolved history rather than weighting the apparently still-unresolved GPL violation as an ongoing, current transparency concern the way we do.
| Source | Score | Type |
|---|
Scores compiled by our editorial team from publicly available reviews as of August 2026. "Editorial estimate" means the outlet didn't publish a single numeric score, so we converted their published verdict and sentiment into a comparable 100-point figure. Verify current figures directly with each source before citing them elsewhere.
No. Kraken Security Labs was explicit that despite "multiple attempts and angles," they were not able to steal cryptocurrency or extract the seed phrase from the device's core secure element.
The device contains GPLv2-licensed open-source components (U-Boot and the Linux kernel). That license legally requires SafePal to make the corresponding source code available on request. SafePal refused Kraken's 2021 request, and an independent source reconfirmed as recently as December 2025 that the required source code still hasn't been released.
Yes. SafePal released firmware v1.0.24 specifically to patch the downgrade vulnerability Kraken demonstrated in 2021.
Yes. There's no Bluetooth, WiFi, NFC, or USB data connection at all. The device communicates exclusively through QR codes read via its camera and displayed on its screen, and the charging cable carries power only, no data.
Yes, the device can be powered by standard AAA batteries or charged via its built-in 400 mAh rechargeable battery over USB-C, a real, distinctive flexibility most competitors don't offer.
Choose the S1 Pro if you want a more premium aluminum alloy and tempered-glass build with longer battery life. Choose the S1 specifically if price is your main consideration; both share the same fully air-gapped security model.
For about $30 more, the Trezor Safe 3 offers fully open-source firmware and hardware plus a certified secure element, a genuine transparency upgrade, though it lacks the S1's air-gapped design entirely.
Only through SafePal's own official store. Third-party marketplace listings are a real, documented risk for tampered devices across this entire category.
More Reviews
BitBox02 – Hardware Wallet Review
Score: 71/100. Swiss-made, open-source, and genuinely clever, but sources disagree on whether multisig still works.
Read MoreLedger Flex – Hardware Wallet Review
Score: 76/100. Best chip Ledger makes, but closed-source firmware, the Recover controversy, and two breaches still linger.
Read MoreNGrave Zero – Hardware Wallet Review
Score: 62/100. The "EAL7 wallet" is real, but the actual secure element underneath is a lower EAL5+ chip.
Read MoreTrezor Safe 7 – Hardware Wallet Review
Score: 78/100. Fully auditable TROPIC01 chip, undercut by a real Ledger Donjon laser fault-injection disclosure.
Read More



