SafePal S1; Reviewed & Scored | The Block Note
Hardware Wallet Review · Updated August 2026

SafePal S1:
$49.99 for a fully air-gapped design, and a five-year-old open-source promise still unkept.

We tore apart SafePal's budget QR-signing hardware wallet across seven weighted categories; from a genuinely thorough air-gapped design with no Bluetooth, WiFi, NFC, or USB data connection at all, and a secure element that resisted extraction under real, adversarial testing, to a technically-confirmed 2021 firmware downgrade vulnerability (since patched) and an apparently still-unresolved GPL open-source license violation an independent source reconfirmed as recently as December 2025; and landed on a score the marketing page won't show you.

Type Hardware Wallet Touchscreen Yes (1.3" color IPS, no touch) Price $49.99 Discount Offer None
safepal
S1
EAL6+ secure element, 100% air-gapped
QR signing only · No wireless

Our take, up front: at $49.99, the SafePal S1 is genuinely one of the most affordable ways to get real hardware-backed self-custody in this entire series, delivering a certified EAL6+ secure element and a fully air-gapped design, no Bluetooth, WiFi, NFC, or USB data connection of any kind, through a QR-code signing workflow instead. Backed by Binance Labs and used by a genuinely large real user base, the company has real credibility. In February 2021, Kraken Security Labs published a detailed security disclosure: the core secure element resisted extraction despite "multiple attempts and angles," a real, meaningful positive, but Kraken also confirmed a working firmware downgrade attack (since patched) and disputed tamper-detection effectiveness (which SafePal pushed back on as an EMC-compliance component, not a core security feature). The more serious, lingering issue: Kraken found the device contains GPL-licensed open-source components that legally require SafePal to release the corresponding source code, and SafePal refused. An independent source reconfirmed as recently as December 2025 that this violation remains unresolved, nearly five years after the company said it intended to release the code in 2021. We weighted all of it below.

The S1 uses a certified EAL6+ secure element with tamper-detection sensors, inside a fully air-gapped design: no Bluetooth, WiFi, NFC, or USB data connection exists at all, only a QR-code signing workflow between the device's camera, screen, and your phone. In February 2021, Kraken Security Labs published a detailed, adversarial security disclosure. The genuinely reassuring part: despite "multiple attempts and angles," Kraken was not able to steal cryptocurrency or extract the seed from the core secure element. The more concerning parts: Kraken demonstrated a working firmware downgrade attack, flashing the device back to an older, potentially vulnerable firmware version without detection, which SafePal subsequently patched in firmware v1.0.24; and Kraken bypassed the device's tamper-detection mechanism by removing an RF shield, which SafePal disputes is a core security feature, characterizing it instead as a component required for electromagnetic compliance rather than security. The most serious, lingering issue: the device contains GPL-licensed open-source components (U-Boot and the Linux kernel) that legally obligate SafePal to release corresponding source code on request; SafePal refused Kraken's request in 2021, stated it intended to release the code that year, and an independent source reconfirmed as recently as December 2025 that this violation remains unresolved nearly five years later.

Why this scores below several other budget devices in this series: the core secure element genuinely resisted adversarial extraction, a real positive, but a confirmed (if patched) downgrade vulnerability and, more significantly, an apparently still-unresolved, half-decade-old open-source licensing violation are real, documented marks against a company that markets itself partly on security transparency.

Pros

  • Core secure element resisted extraction under real, adversarial third-party testing
  • Fully air-gapped design with no wireless or USB-data attack surface at all
  • The confirmed firmware downgrade vulnerability was patched

Cons

  • A real, confirmed firmware downgrade attack existed prior to patching
  • Apparently still-unresolved GPL open-source license violation, reconfirmed as recently as December 2025
  • Closed-source firmware beyond the specific GPL-covered components

The S1 supports 200-plus blockchains, with NFT, DeFi, and DApp access available directly through the SafePal App, genuinely competitive coverage for a device at this price point.

Why this scores well: genuinely broad multi-chain support at a budget price point is a strong showing relative to most competitors in this series.

Pros

  • 200-plus supported blockchains
  • NFT, DeFi, and DApp access through the companion app

Cons

  • None significant found in our research

The QR-code workflow, build a transaction on your phone, scan it to the device, verify on-screen, sign, scan the signed result back, is a real, functional air-gapped interaction method. But at least one detailed reviewer describes the D-pad navigation as "noticeably slower and less intuitive" than touchscreen competitors like the Trezor Safe 5 or ELLIPAL Titan, with scrolling through long addresses or menus requiring real patience.

Why this scores below touchscreen competitors: the QR-signing workflow is functional and genuinely air-gapped, but the D-pad navigation is independently described as a real, meaningful step down in day-to-day usability compared to touchscreen alternatives.

Pros

  • Functional, genuinely air-gapped QR-code signing workflow
  • 1.3" full-color IPS screen for on-device verification

Cons

  • D-pad navigation independently described as slower and less intuitive than touchscreen competitors
  • Long addresses and menus require real patience to navigate

The S1 uses a plastic ABS and PVC construction, explicitly more basic than the S1 Pro's aluminum alloy and tempered-glass build. Real, independently-documented complaints describe the small screen as scratching easily and the battery self-discharging during storage. A genuine, distinctive positive: the 400 mAh battery can be recharged via USB-C or supplemented with standard AAA batteries, real flexibility most competitors don't offer.

Why this scores at the lower end: a genuinely basic plastic build with real, independently-documented screen and battery-storage complaints is a meaningful trade-off for the price, though the dual power-source flexibility is a genuine, distinctive positive.

Pros

  • Real, distinctive dual power-source flexibility (AAA batteries or USB-C)

Cons

  • Basic ABS/PVC plastic construction
  • Screen independently reported to scratch easily
  • Battery reportedly self-discharges during storage

SafePal is genuinely backed by Binance Labs, and the company reports a real, large user base of 20 to 25 million people across its software and hardware products. SafePal responded reasonably quickly to Kraken's 2021 disclosure, patching the confirmed downgrade vulnerability. But the apparently still-unresolved GPL license violation, independently reconfirmed as recently as December 2025, nearly five years after SafePal said it intended to release the required source code, is a genuine, ongoing reliability and transparency concern.

Why this scores at the midpoint: real institutional backing and a large user base are genuine positives, but an apparently still-unresolved, half-decade-old licensing violation is a real, ongoing trust concern that a fast initial patch response doesn't fully offset.

Pros

  • Real institutional backing from Binance Labs
  • Large, real user base (20-25 million across software and hardware)
  • Responded reasonably quickly to patch the 2021 downgrade vulnerability

Cons

  • Apparently still-unresolved GPL license violation, nearly five years after promising to resolve it

At $49.99, this is genuinely one of the most affordable hardware wallets in this entire series, delivering a certified EAL6+ secure element and a fully air-gapped design well below what most direct competitors charge for comparable core security architecture. No subscription fee.

Why this scores among the highest Value ratings in this series: real hardware-backed, air-gapped security at one of the lowest price points we've reviewed is a genuinely strong value proposition.

Pros

  • One of the lowest prices in this entire series for genuine air-gapped, EAL6+ security
  • No subscription fee

Cons

  • None significant found in our research

Three included mnemonic phrase cards give buyers a real, immediate way to record their seed phrase. A separately-sold "Cypher Seed Board," a metal plate for engraving the seed phrase against fire, water, and corrosion, is a real, genuine durable backup option. Dual power-source flexibility (AAA batteries or USB-C) is itself a real, distinctive extra.

Pros

  • Optional Cypher Seed Board metal backup plate available
  • Dual power-source flexibility (AAA or USB-C)

Cons

  • None significant found in our research
Where to buy

Buy only through SafePal's official store.

Third-party marketplace listings are a real, documented vector for tampered devices. Buying direct is the only way to be confident your unit hasn't been modified before it reached you.

0/ 100

Real budget security, with a five-year-old promise still unkept.

The core of what the S1 promises genuinely holds up: a fully air-gapped design, a secure element that resisted extraction under real adversarial testing, and hardware-backed self-custody at a price most competitors can't match. That's real, substantive value. What keeps this from scoring higher isn't a single dramatic failure, it's an accumulation of smaller, real, honestly-documented issues: a confirmed (if patched) downgrade vulnerability, a plastic build with independently-reported screen and battery complaints, and most notably, an open-source licensing violation the company said it would fix in 2021 and, per the most recent independent check we found, still hasn't. None of this means your funds are at risk today. It does mean a company that markets itself partly on transparency has a real, specific, multi-year gap between what it promised and what it delivered.

Best forBudget-conscious buyers who want genuine air-gapped security and can accept a more basic build and interface
Not forAnyone who specifically prioritizes verified open-source transparency, or wants a touchscreen experience
Score Ledger
safepal s1 · 7 line items
01Security16.5
02Assets16.0
03UX7.5
04Build4.5
05Support5.0
06Value9.0
07Extras3.25
TOTAL61.75
≈ 62 / 100; Real value, unkept promises

The scorecard above is deliberately general. Whether the SafePal S1 is right for you depends heavily on which of these you already are.

Best fit

The budget-conscious buyer who wants genuine air-gapped isolation

A fully air-gapped design with no wireless attack surface at all, for under $50, is a real, distinctive value proposition most competitors can't match at this price.

Good fit

The multi-chain holder who wants broad support without paying a premium

200-plus supported blockchains at a budget price point covers most mainstream holdings without needing a pricier device.

Workable fit

The occasional user who doesn't mind a slower, D-pad-based interface

If you're not signing transactions daily, the more basic navigation and QR-scanning workflow are a manageable trade-off for the price.

Poor fit

Anyone who specifically prioritizes verified, fully open-source transparency

The apparently still-unresolved GPL license violation is a real, disqualifying factor if independently verifiable code is a hard requirement for you.

The scorecard covers the headline judgment calls. These four tables cover the specifics we didn't want to bury in prose; the 2021 Kraken disclosure in plain terms, the GPL violation timeline and its current status, SafePal's own lineup, and how it compares against the other wallets we've reviewed.

The 2021 Kraken Security Labs disclosure, in plain terms

FindingOutcome
Seed/key extractionNot achieved despite "multiple attempts and angles," per Kraken's own report
Firmware downgrade attackConfirmed working; SafePal patched it in firmware v1.0.24
Tamper-detection bypassConfirmed by Kraken; SafePal disputes it as a core security issue, calling the affected component an EMC-compliance requirement
GPL license violationConfirmed; SafePal refused to release legally-required source code

Disclosed to SafePal on November 18, 2020; published publicly by Kraken on February 16, 2021.

The GPL violation: promised fix vs. current status

DateStatus
February 2021Kraken publishes the finding; SafePal states it "intend[s] to release source code in 2021"
2021 (later)No source code release found by independent trackers
December 2025WalletScrutiny, an independent source, reconfirms the violation remains unresolved
TodayNo evidence found of SafePal releasing the GPL-required source code

This is a legal compliance question, not just a security one: GPLv2 licensing legally requires source code to be made available for the licensed components (U-Boot and the Linux kernel) running on the device.

SafePal's own lineup

DevicePriceConnectivityBuild
S1$49.99Fully air-gapped (QR only)ABS + PVC plastic, 400 mAh battery
X1Not specified in sources reviewedBluetooth-enabledABS + tempered glass
S1 Pro$89.99Fully air-gapped (QR only)Aluminum alloy + tempered glass, 500 mAh battery

Choose the S1 Pro over the S1 specifically for the more premium build; choose the X1 only if Bluetooth convenience matters more to you than strict air-gapped signing.

How it compares to other hardware wallets we've reviewed

WalletPriceAir-gapped?Notable trade-off
SafePal S1$49.99Yes, fullyConfirmed (patched) downgrade flaw; apparently unresolved GPL violation
Trezor Safe 3$59NoDisclosed, unpatchable microcontroller vulnerability
Tangem Wallet$54.90-$69.90N/A (NFC card)Unpatchable disclosed laser attack
Coldcard MK4$148-$178Yes, fullyActive advisory; $100M+ in confirmed real-world theft

At $49.99, the S1 is among the cheapest devices in this entire series; its real, ongoing issue is a licensing and transparency gap rather than a confirmed loss of funds.

We don't just want to hand you our number; we want to show you how it sits next to what other review desks and comparison sites have published. Most coverage leads with the genuine air-gap and value story, and several sources mention the 2021 Kraken disclosure only briefly as historical context rather than as an ongoing concern.

The Block Note (us)N/A / 100
Industry averageN/A / 100

Our score lands meaningfully below the aggregated industry average; most sources treat the 2021 Kraken findings as resolved history rather than weighting the apparently still-unresolved GPL violation as an ongoing, current transparency concern the way we do.

SourceScoreType

Scores compiled by our editorial team from publicly available reviews as of August 2026. "Editorial estimate" means the outlet didn't publish a single numeric score, so we converted their published verdict and sentiment into a comparable 100-point figure. Verify current figures directly with each source before citing them elsewhere.

No. Kraken Security Labs was explicit that despite "multiple attempts and angles," they were not able to steal cryptocurrency or extract the seed phrase from the device's core secure element.

The device contains GPLv2-licensed open-source components (U-Boot and the Linux kernel). That license legally requires SafePal to make the corresponding source code available on request. SafePal refused Kraken's 2021 request, and an independent source reconfirmed as recently as December 2025 that the required source code still hasn't been released.

Yes. SafePal released firmware v1.0.24 specifically to patch the downgrade vulnerability Kraken demonstrated in 2021.

Yes. There's no Bluetooth, WiFi, NFC, or USB data connection at all. The device communicates exclusively through QR codes read via its camera and displayed on its screen, and the charging cable carries power only, no data.

Yes, the device can be powered by standard AAA batteries or charged via its built-in 400 mAh rechargeable battery over USB-C, a real, distinctive flexibility most competitors don't offer.

Choose the S1 Pro if you want a more premium aluminum alloy and tempered-glass build with longer battery life. Choose the S1 specifically if price is your main consideration; both share the same fully air-gapped security model.

For about $30 more, the Trezor Safe 3 offers fully open-source firmware and hardware plus a certified secure element, a genuine transparency upgrade, though it lacks the S1's air-gapped design entirely.

Only through SafePal's own official store. Third-party marketplace listings are a real, documented risk for tampered devices across this entire category.

Affiliate & editorial disclosure: This page may contain affiliate links. If you buy through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. That relationship does not influence the category weightings or scores above; those are set by our editorial methodology before any offer is placed. Hardware wallets reduce but do not eliminate risk; physical loss, supply-chain tampering, and user error remain possible. Nothing here is financial advice.
Specs, pricing, and security details verified against public sources as of Aug 2026; always confirm current terms directly with SafePal.

More Reviews