3Commas:
genuinely distinctive TradingView automation, sitting on a real, documented 2022 incident history.
We tore apart 3Commas, running automated crypto trading since before Bitsgap and most of this category, across the same seven weighted categories as this new series; from genuinely distinctive TradingView and Pine Script webhook integration independently called one of the category's clearest differentiators, a flexible Signal Bot and manual-plus SmartTrade workflow, and a real, well-documented 4.4-out-of-5 Trustpilot rating from over 1,756 reviews, to a real, documented two-incident security history from 2022, one involving user-side phishing and a separate one involving actual platform-side API data exposure, and a real, consistently-echoed criticism that the subscription pricing is expensive relative to the value some users extract from it; and landed on a score the marketing page won't show you.
Our take, up front: 3Commas has been running for over a decade, genuinely one of the longer track records we're likely to find in this category. Real, genuinely non-custodial: your crypto stays on your connected exchange; 3Commas never takes custody, sending trade instructions via API keys with trading-only permissions instead. Real, genuinely distinctive TradingView and Pine Script webhook integration lets you fire a bot entry from a custom signal, layer in DCA safety orders automatically, and exit on a custom condition, independently described as one of the clearest differentiators in this category, and a real, direct point of differentiation from Bitsgap, which lacks native scripting support. Real, Signal Bot lets external signals drive entries and exits with custom logic, and real, SmartTrade offers a genuine manual-plus workflow for discretionary traders. Real, specific, well-documented third-party sentiment: a 4.4 out of 5 rating on Trustpilot from more than 1,756 reviews recorded in October 2025, a substantial sample size. What we can't set aside: 3Commas carries a real, documented two-incident security history from 2022. In October, a phishing campaign tricked users into entering API keys on fake sites, framed by the company itself as user-side key compromise rather than a direct platform breach. Separately, in December, the company published a public FAQ describing a distinct incident involving exposed API data, a real, more serious category of finding since it points toward platform-side exposure rather than user error alone. The company reports significant infrastructure upgrades and third-party audits since. And a real, consistently-echoed criticism across multiple sources: the platform "is not cheap," and its tier structure has caused real, documented user frustration. We weighted all of it below.
Real, genuinely distinctive TradingView webhook integration lets you fire bot entries directly from Pine Script signals, layer in DCA safety orders automatically, and exit on custom conditions, independently described as one of the clearest differentiators in this category, and a real, direct point of differentiation from Bitsgap, which lacks native scripting support. Real, Signal Bot lets external signals drive entries and exits with custom logic, including dynamic grid behavior. Real, SmartTrade offers a genuine "manual-plus" workflow for discretionary traders who want structured take-profit, stop-loss, and trailing behavior without full automation. Real, honest limitation: futures bot functionality is explicitly described as limited compared to spot trading. Real, honest, consistently-noted complexity: bot configuration screens, especially grid systems and AI-assisted settings, can be overwhelming for beginners and take real time to understand.
Pros
- Genuinely distinctive TradingView and Pine Script webhook integration
- Flexible Signal Bot with custom logic, including dynamic grid behavior
- SmartTrade offers a real manual-plus workflow for discretionary traders
Cons
- Futures bot functionality explicitly narrower than spot
- Grid and AI-assisted configuration screens can overwhelm beginners
Real, genuinely non-custodial: funds never leave your connected exchange account; 3Commas sends trade instructions via API keys with trading-only permissions, meaning even a compromised key cannot withdraw funds directly. What we can't set aside: 3Commas has a real, documented history of two distinct 2022 incidents. In October 2022, a phishing campaign tricked users into entering API keys on fake sites, framed by 3Commas itself as user-side key compromise rather than a direct platform breach. Separately, in December 2022, the company published a public FAQ describing a distinct incident involving exposed API data. Real, the company reports significant infrastructure upgrades and third-party audits since these incidents. Real, honest, ongoing trust consideration: at least one detailed source notes historical API leak concerns still affect some users' trust even with stronger controls now in place.
Pros
- Genuinely non-custodial; trading-only API permissions prevent direct withdrawal
- Real, disclosed infrastructure upgrades and third-party audits since 2022
Cons
- Real, documented October 2022 phishing-driven API key compromise
- Separate, distinct December 2022 incident involving exposed API data
- Historical API leak concerns still affect some users' trust today
Real, broad multi-exchange support described as spanning "dozens of exchanges," though we couldn't find as precise a named list as we found reviewing Bitsgap. Real, both spot and futures trading supported, though futures bot functionality is explicitly narrower than spot.
Pros
- Broad multi-exchange support spanning dozens of platforms
- Both spot and futures trading supported
Cons
- Less precise, specifically-named exchange count than found reviewing Bitsgap
- Futures bot functionality explicitly limited compared to spot
Real, interface redesigned in late 2024, independently described as clean and functional in its current form. Real, honest, consistently-noted limitation: bot configuration screens can be overwhelming for beginners, especially for grid systems and AI-assisted settings. Real, honest reliability concern specific to volatile conditions: some users report service instability during sharp market corrections, including missed alerts and interrupted execution.
Pros
- Interface redesigned in late 2024; independently called clean and functional
Cons
- Configuration screens can overwhelm beginners
- Real, user-reported instability during sharp market corrections
Real, over a decade of operation, a genuinely longer track record than we found reviewing Bitsgap. Real, specific, well-documented third-party sentiment: a 4.4 out of 5 rating on Trustpilot from more than 1,756 reviews recorded in October 2025, a substantial sample size. Real, consistently positive support sentiment, with fast live chat and Telegram responses and API issues reportedly resolved within hours.
Pros
- Over a decade of continuous operation
- 4.4/5 Trustpilot rating from 1,756+ reviews, a substantial sample size
- Consistently positive support sentiment; API issues resolved within hours
Cons
- Real 2022 incident history weighed separately in the Security category
Real, free plan available, limited to one DCA bot and one grid bot. Real, precisely quantified paid tiers: Starter around $29/month, Advanced around $49/month, and Pro around $99/month, with annual billing reducing costs by a real, quantified 30-40%. Real, consistently-noted criticism across multiple sources: the platform "is not cheap," and the tier structure has caused real, documented user frustration.
Pros
- Free tier available for basic testing
- Precisely quantified tiers; 30-40% discount on annual billing
Cons
- Consistently criticized across sources as expensive relative to value for some users
- Tier structure has caused real, documented user frustration
Real, TradingView and Pine Script webhook integration is a genuinely distinctive, real capability unmatched in our research on Bitsgap specifically. Real, Signal Bot and SmartTrade round out a genuinely flexible, real feature set for both automated and discretionary traders.
Pros
- Distinctive TradingView and Pine Script webhook integration
- Flexible toolkit spanning full automation and discretionary trading
Cons
- None significant found in our research
Sign up only through 3Commas' official site.
Given the real 2022 phishing incident that specifically targeted users through fake sites, this matters more than usual: bookmark the official URL directly, enable 2FA, use trading-only API permissions, and enable IP whitelisting on your exchange's API settings.
Genuinely powerful for TradingView-first traders, sitting on a real security scar that hasn't fully faded.
3Commas earns real, distinctive credit for something Bitsgap simply doesn't offer: genuine Pine Script and TradingView webhook automation, turning a chart alert into live execution without writing custom infrastructure. That's a real, substantive differentiator for exactly the kind of trader who already lives inside TradingView. What keeps this from scoring higher is equally real: two separate 2022 incidents, one user-side phishing and one involving actual platform-side API data exposure, are a meaningfully more serious finding than anything we found reviewing Bitsgap, even with the company's real, disclosed improvements since. Layer on a consistently-echoed criticism that the pricing doesn't always justify itself, and the honest picture is a platform with real, genuine strengths that deserves a more careful, security-conscious setup than a newer, cleaner-record competitor might.
The scorecard above is deliberately general. Whether 3Commas is right for you depends heavily on which of these you already are.
The TradingView-first trader who wants Pine Script alerts routed straight into execution
This is a real, genuinely distinctive capability we didn't find anywhere in our research on Bitsgap.
The discretionary trader who wants structured take-profit and stop-loss without full automation
SmartTrade's manual-plus workflow is genuinely built for exactly this use case.
The trader diligent about API key hygiene: 2FA, trading-only permissions, IP whitelisting
Given the real 2022 incident history, this isn't optional diligence, it's the practical price of admission.
Traders with a very small balance, or anyone uncomfortable managing API security closely
At least one detailed source explicitly cautions that subscription cost can outweigh any realistic edge at small scale.
The scorecard covers the headline judgment calls. These four tables cover the specifics we didn't want to bury in prose; the two 2022 incidents precisely, the pricing tiers as currently quantified, Bitsgap vs. 3Commas head to head, and a real, honest note on security best practice for any API-key-based bot.
The two 2022 incidents, precisely
| When | What | Category |
|---|---|---|
| October 2022 | Phishing campaign; users entered API keys on fake sites, later used for unauthorized trades | User-side key compromise, per 3Commas' own framing |
| December 2022 | 3Commas published a public FAQ describing an incident involving exposed API data | Platform-side data exposure |
We're treating these as two distinct findings rather than one: the October incident is consistent with user-side phishing, while the December incident points toward an actual platform-side exposure, a real, meaningfully more serious category. 3Commas reports significant infrastructure upgrades and third-party audits since both.
Pricing tiers, as currently quantified
| Tier | Price | Includes |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 1 DCA bot, 1 grid bot |
| Starter | ~$29/mo | Expanded bot limits |
| Advanced | ~$49/mo | Unlimited deals, Smart Trade, full bot access |
| Pro | ~$99/mo | Highest limits |
Annual billing reduces these figures by a real, quantified 30-40%; at least one detailed source specifically recommends the Advanced tier as the best value for most active traders.
Bitsgap vs. 3Commas, head to head
| Bitsgap | 3Commas | |
|---|---|---|
| Cross-exchange arbitrage | Yes, distinctive | Not featured |
| TradingView / Pine Script webhooks | No (webhooks as workaround only) | Yes, distinctive |
| Backtesting depth | 365-day simulator, independently called the best on the market | Less emphasized in our research |
| Disclosed security incidents | None found | Two, documented (2022) |
| Entry pricing | ~$23-28/mo (discrepancy across sources) | Free tier + ~$29/mo Starter |
These are genuinely complementary strengths rather than one bot simply beating the other: Bitsgap wins on arbitrage and backtesting depth, 3Commas wins on TradingView automation and discretionary trading tools, and Bitsgap currently holds the cleaner disclosed-incident record.
Real, consistently-recommended API key hygiene
| Practice | Why it matters here specifically |
|---|---|
| Trading-only API permissions, never withdrawal | Even a fully compromised key can't move funds off the exchange |
| IP whitelisting on the exchange's API settings | Blocks use of a stolen key from an unrecognized location |
| Two-factor authentication on both 3Commas and the exchange | A real, standard second layer independently recommended across multiple sources |
| Rotating keys periodically or if anything looks suspicious | Limits the exposure window if a key is ever compromised without your knowledge |
This isn't 3Commas-specific advice; it's the real, standard practice for any bot platform connecting to your exchange via API keys, and it applies just as directly to Bitsgap or any future platform we review in this series.
We don't just want to hand you our number; we want to show you how it sits next to what other review desks and comparison sites have published. This includes a real, specifically-cited Trustpilot rating from a substantial sample size, which we're presenting alongside editorial reviews rather than blending together, since aggregated user sentiment and editorial analysis are different kinds of evidence.
Our score lands meaningfully below the aggregated industry average, the largest gap we've found in this new series so far; most sources, including the strongly positive Trustpilot sentiment, weight the genuine TradingView integration and long track record heavily, while giving comparatively less weight to the real, documented 2022 incident history and the consistently-echoed pricing criticism than our methodology does.
| Source | Score | Type |
|---|
Scores compiled by our editorial team from publicly available reviews as of August 2026. "Editorial estimate" means the outlet didn't publish a single numeric score, so we converted their published verdict and sentiment into a comparable 100-point figure. Verify current figures directly with each source before citing them elsewhere.
Two distinct incidents occurred in 2022: an October phishing campaign that compromised user API keys via fake sites, and a separate December incident involving exposed API data on the platform side. 3Commas reports significant infrastructure upgrades and third-party audits since both.
No. Your crypto stays on your connected exchange; 3Commas sends trade instructions via API keys with trading-only permissions. Always disable withdrawal permission on the key itself.
Yes, genuinely and natively. 3Commas supports TradingView and Pine Script webhook integration, letting you route chart alerts directly into automated execution, independently described as one of the clearest differentiators in this category.
A free tier exists, limited to one DCA bot and one grid bot. Paid tiers run roughly $29-99/month depending on features, with a 30-40% discount on annual billing. Multiple sources consistently describe the pricing as expensive relative to value for some users.
The free tier and simple Grid/DCA setups are accessible, but multiple sources note bot configuration screens, especially for grid systems and AI-assisted settings, can be overwhelming for beginners.
Yes, on exchanges where available, though futures bot functionality is explicitly described as more limited than spot trading.
A manual-plus trading workflow for discretionary traders, supporting structured take-profit, stop-loss, and trailing behavior without requiring full bot automation.
Genuinely complementary strengths: Bitsgap offers distinctive cross-exchange arbitrage and a deeper backtesting simulator with a cleaner disclosed-incident record; 3Commas offers native TradingView automation and discretionary trading tools, alongside a real, documented 2022 incident history.
More Reviews
Bitsgap – Crypto Trading Bots Review
Score: 74/100. Distinctive cross-exchange arbitrage and the deepest backtester in the series, but no free tier and a disputed exchange count.
Read More
Cryptohopper – Crypto Trading Bots Review
Score: 67/100. A genuine third-party strategy marketplace, on a platform multiple 2026 sources say is losing ground to newer rivals.
Read More
Pionex – Crypto Trading Bots Review
Score: 67/100. The lowest fees in the series on a custodial exchange, with one confirmed breach, one disputed, and a pending MAS license.
Read More
Coinrule – Crypto Trading Bots Review
Score: 65/100. A genuinely distinctive no-code rule builder, reviewed on the messiest, most conflicting source material in this series.
Read More