The Sandbox; Reviewed & Scored | The Block Note
P2E Crypto Game Review · Updated August 2026

The Sandbox: $93M from SoftBank, Snoop Dogg as a neighbor, and still stuck in perpetual alpha.

We're continuing our P2E Crypto Games series with The Sandbox, a voxel-based creator metaverse originally built as a mobile game by Pixowl in 2012, acquired by Animoca Brands in 2018, and pivoted to blockchain under co-founders Arthur Madrid (CEO) and Sebastien Borget (COO). Real, disclosed genuine strengths: the best-funded metaverse project in crypto gaming, with a $93 million Series B led by SoftBank Vision Fund 2, credible celebrity and brand partnerships (Snoop Dogg, Adidas, Warner Music), and a formally verified CertiK audit of its SAND and LAND contracts. What we don't think should be set aside: two confirmed security incidents, a March 2023 employee-computer compromise that led to a phishing email campaign, and an August 2026 cross-chain bridge exploit that let an attacker create unbacked SAND on Base and BNB Smart Chain, though The Sandbox states the real impact was under 0.01% of total supply with Ethereum and Polygon unaffected. Real, disclosed severe decline: SAND is down over 95% from its ~$8.40 peak, LAND floor prices have separately collapsed over 90%, and a detailed source states directly the platform "remains in perpetual alpha/beta with modest concurrent users" years into development. We weighted all of it below.

Type User-Generated Metaverse (Ethereum + Polygon) Platforms Browser · Desktop Fees SAND for gameplay, LAND, and assets Discount Offer None
the sandbox
P2E Crypto Game
Aug 2026: bridge exploit contained to under 0.01% of supply
SAND down 95%+; LAND floors down 90%+ from peak

Our take, up front: The Sandbox is a voxel-based, user-generated metaverse that began as a mobile game built by Pixowl in 2012, was acquired by Animoca Brands in 2018, and pivoted toward blockchain under co-founders Arthur Madrid (CEO) and Sebastien Borget (COO), both Pixowl co-founders who continue to lead the project with a team of over 200 employees. Real, disclosed genuinely deep funding: $93 million raised in a Series B led by SoftBank Vision Fund 2, alongside Animoca Brands, Galaxy Interactive, and other credible institutional backers, making it, by a detailed source's direct characterization, "the best-funded metaverse project in crypto gaming." Real, disclosed credible brand and celebrity partnerships: Snoop Dogg, Adidas, and Warner Music have all held LAND or run experiences within the platform. Real, disclosed genuinely strong, verifiable audit record: CertiK completed a formal verification of The Sandbox's SAND and LAND token contracts, concluding they are "structurally sound," and a separate, detailed technical source credits the project with a high AA CertiK score. Real, disclosed substantial creator tooling: VoxEdit for no-code 3D voxel asset creation and Game Maker for no-code experience building, supporting a three-part loop of exploring, creating, and owning across 166,464 LAND parcels on a 408x408 map. What we don't think should be set aside: two separate, confirmed security incidents. In March 2023, an unauthorized third party compromised an employee's computer via malware and used the access to send phishing emails to users; The Sandbox stated only user email addresses were exposed, no other systems were compromised, and it took real remediation steps including password resets and 2FA enforcement. More recently, in August 2026, an exploit in SAND's cross-chain bridge contract let an attacker create SAND without proper backing on Base and BNB Smart Chain; The Sandbox's own disclosed assessment states the real impact was under 0.01% of total SAND supply, that Ethereum and Polygon (where the vast majority of SAND and all LAND live) were unaffected, and that no user wallets were compromised, a real, important distinction from headline coverage describing "$49 billion in new tokens" flooding Base, a figure that refers to newly-created illegitimate tokens on the affected side-chains specifically, not real economic damage at that scale. Real, disclosed severe token and asset decline regardless: SAND peaked at roughly $8.40 in November 2021 and is down over 95% since, and LAND floor prices have separately collapsed over 90% from their own peak. Real, disclosed candid critical assessment: a detailed source states directly that "after years of development, The Sandbox remains in perpetual alpha/beta with modest concurrent users" and that "the promise of a thriving virtual economy remains largely unrealized," a real, disclosed tension with a separate source crediting the project's survival to "shipping tools, updating SDKs, and building real production pipelines." We weighted all of it below.

Real, disclosed genuinely strong, verifiable audit record: a formal CertiK verification of SAND and LAND contracts concluding they are "structurally sound," with a separate detailed technical source crediting a high AA CertiK score. Real, disclosed named, long-standing founders (Arthur Madrid, Sebastien Borget). What tempers this: two separate, confirmed incidents, a March 2023 employee-computer compromise leading to a phishing campaign (contained to email addresses only), and an August 2026 cross-chain bridge exploit letting an attacker create unbacked SAND on Base and BNB Smart Chain, though The Sandbox's own disclosed assessment states real impact was under 0.01% of total supply, with Ethereum and Polygon unaffected.

Why this scores above the midpoint: genuinely strong, verifiable audit credentials are a real positive, tempered by two confirmed incidents that were disclosed with real, credible, and comparatively limited impact assessments.

Pros

  • A formal CertiK audit verified SAND and LAND contracts as structurally sound
  • The Aug 2026 bridge exploit was disclosed with a specific, credible impact assessment (under 0.01% of supply)

Cons

  • Mar 2023: an employee-computer compromise led to a real phishing email campaign
  • Aug 2026: a cross-chain bridge contract was exploited to create unbacked SAND

Real, disclosed functioning governance and staking design: SAND holders vote on updates and LAND fund allocations, with staking pools on Ethereum and Polygon. What tempers this severely: SAND peaked at roughly $8.40 in November 2021 and is down over 95% since, and LAND floor prices have separately collapsed over 90% from their own peak, a real, disclosed dual collapse affecting both the token and the platform's core NFT asset class.

Why this scores among the lowest in this series: a genuinely functioning governance and staking design is undercut by a severe, disclosed collapse spanning both the token and the platform's primary NFT asset class.

Pros

  • Functioning staking pools on Ethereum and Polygon with real, disclosed reward mechanisms

Cons

  • SAND is down over 95% from its Nov 2021 peak of roughly $8.40
  • LAND floor prices have separately collapsed over 90% from their own peak

Real, disclosed named, long-standing founders (Arthur Madrid, Sebastien Borget) with a continuous track record since Pixowl's 2012 founding. Real, disclosed functioning SAND governance letting holders vote on updates, feature development, and LAND fund allocations.

Why this scores well: genuinely long-standing, named leadership and a real, disclosed functioning governance mechanism.

Pros

  • Named founders with a continuous, real track record since 2012
  • A functioning SAND governance mechanism covering real budget decisions (LAND fund)

Cons

  • Real-world governance participation levels were not independently confirmed in our research

Real, disclosed genuinely substantial creator economy tooling: VoxEdit for no-code 3D asset creation and Game Maker for no-code experience building, supporting a real three-part explore/create/own loop across 166,464 LAND parcels. What tempers this significantly: a detailed source states directly that "after years of development, The Sandbox remains in perpetual alpha/beta with modest concurrent users," and that "the promise of a thriving virtual economy remains largely unrealized."

Why this scores at the midpoint: genuinely substantial, real creator tooling is a real strength, tempered by a real, disclosed, multi-year failure to ship a persistent, fully-realized open world.

Pros

  • Real, substantial no-code creator tools (VoxEdit, Game Maker)
  • A large, real, disclosed scale: 166,464 LAND parcels across a 408x408 map

Cons

  • A detailed source states the platform remains in "perpetual alpha/beta" years into development
  • Concurrent user numbers are described directly as "modest" relative to the platform's scale and funding

Real, disclosed genuinely accessible no-code creation tools (VoxEdit, Game Maker) requiring no coding skills. What tempers this: the platform's own seasonal "Alpha" event structure means persistent, always-available access remains real, disclosed limited years into development.

Why this scores at the midpoint: genuinely accessible creation tools are a real strength, tempered by a real, disclosed lack of a persistent, always-on core experience.

Pros

  • No-code creation tools genuinely require no programming skill to use

Cons

  • Access remains structured around seasonal "Alpha" events rather than persistent availability

Real, disclosed transparent utility design: SAND is required for gameplay, avatar customization, and asset purchases, with staking rewards available on Ethereum and Polygon.

Why this scores above the midpoint: a genuinely transparent, real, disclosed fee and utility structure.

Pros

  • Transparent, disclosed utility across gameplay, customization, and marketplace purchases

Cons

  • LAND ownership remains a real, disclosed significant upfront cost for creators

Real, disclosed credible brand and celebrity partnerships (Snoop Dogg, Adidas, Warner Music), and real, disclosed substantial funding depth ($93M Series B led by SoftBank) supporting continued development.

Pros

  • Genuinely credible, real, mainstream brand and celebrity partnerships
  • Among the deepest, most credible funding of any project in this series

Cons

  • Deep funding and credible partnerships have not yet translated into a finished, persistent product
Where to get it

Access only through the official site, and read past the funding and celebrity headlines to the platform's own uptime.

Given the real, disclosed gap between The Sandbox's exceptional funding and its still-alpha product status, evaluate a LAND or asset purchase based on what you can actually do in the platform today, not on brand partnerships or funding announcements alone.

0/ 100

The best-funded project in this series, and still not the one we'd point to as proof the model works.

We want to give The Sandbox real credit for two things that are genuinely rare together: a formally verified, structurally sound audit from a named firm, and funding depth that makes almost everything else in this series look modest by comparison. $93 million from SoftBank alone is a real, serious institutional bet, and Snoop Dogg and Adidas showing up as actual neighbors rather than marketing partners is a genuinely credible signal most crypto games never earn. We also want to be direct about what all of that money hasn't bought yet. Years after that funding closed, a detailed, credible source describes the platform as still being in "perpetual alpha/beta with modest concurrent users," which is a genuinely damning thing to be true of the best-funded project in the category. Two separate, real security incidents, contained and disclosed responsibly, don't change our overall read: The Sandbox has built impressive tools and assembled an impressive roster of partners, and it still hasn't shipped the persistent, thriving virtual world that funding was raised to build. Recognize the tools for what they are. Don't mistake the funding round for the finished product.

Best forCreators interested in genuinely capable, real no-code world-building tools, evaluated on their own terms rather than on funding headlines
Not forAnyone buying LAND or SAND expecting the platform's funding and brand partnerships to translate soon into a finished, persistent metaverse
Score Ledger
the sandbox · 7 line items
01Security19.5
02Tokenomics6.0
03Decentralization9.75
04Gameplay5.0
05UX5.5
06Fees6.0
07Extras3.0
TOTAL54.75
≈ 55 / 100; Best-funded, still alpha

The scorecard above is deliberately general. Whether The Sandbox is right for you depends heavily on which of these you already are.

Best fit

The creator who wants genuinely capable, real no-code 3D world-building tools, independent of the token's own performance

This is exactly where The Sandbox's real, substantial VoxEdit and Game Maker tooling deliver genuine value.

Good fit

The prospective participant who evaluates the platform's actual current alpha/beta state before buying LAND or SAND

Given the real, disclosed "perpetual alpha" characterization, checking what's actually usable today genuinely matters here.

Workable fit

The SAND holder who understands the Aug 2026 bridge exploit affected Base and BSC specifically, not Ethereum or Polygon

This distinction is real, disclosed, and directly relevant to correctly scoping the incident's actual impact.

Poor fit

Anyone buying in based primarily on the SoftBank funding round or celebrity partnerships as evidence of a finished product

A detailed, credible source states directly the platform remains in perpetual alpha years after that funding closed.

The scorecard covers the headline judgment calls. These four tables cover the specifics we didn't want to bury in prose; the two confirmed security incidents timelined precisely, the August 2026 bridge exploit's real impact scoped out, SAND and LAND's price chronology, and the funding and partnerships that built this platform.

Two confirmed incidents, timelined precisely

DateWhat happened
Feb 26, 2023An unauthorized third party compromises an employee's computer via malware
Mar 2, 2023The Sandbox publicly discloses the incident; a phishing email ("PURELAND Access") is sent to users from the compromised access
Mar 2023 responseOnly user email addresses were exposed; passwords reset, 2FA enforced, employee's laptop reset
Aug 22, 2026An exploit in SAND's cross-chain bridge (OFT) contract lets an attacker create unbacked SAND on Base and BNB Smart Chain
Aug 2026 responseThe Sandbox states the issue is fully contained; bridging is stopped on both affected networks

Both incidents were publicly disclosed with specific, verifiable containment details rather than vague reassurance, a real, disclosed positive relative to less transparent incident responses we've found elsewhere.

The August 2026 bridge exploit, real impact scoped out

ClaimWhat The Sandbox disclosed
Headline figure"$49 billion in new tokens" flooding Base, per aggregator coverage
What that figure representsNewly-created, illegitimate SAND on the affected side-chains specifically, not real economic value stolen
Actual disclosed impactLess than 0.01% of total SAND supply
Chains affectedBase and BNB Smart Chain only
Chains NOT affectedEthereum and Polygon, where the vast majority of SAND and all LAND reside
User walletsThe Sandbox states no user wallets were hacked

A dramatic headline number describing newly-minted illegitimate tokens on a side-chain is not the same as real economic damage at that scale; we think this distinction matters enough to spell out explicitly rather than let the larger figure stand unexplained.

SAND and LAND, from peak to today

SANDLAND
Peak~$8.40 (Nov 2021)Peak floor prices during the 2021-22 metaverse boom
Current declineDown over 95% from peakFloor prices down over 90% from peak
Underlying asset typeERC-20 utility/governance tokenNFT representing one of 166,464 virtual land parcels

We're tracking these separately because they're genuinely distinct asset classes with independent price histories; both collapsed severely, but for different, if related, reasons tied to overall platform demand.

The funding and partnerships that built this platform

CategoryDetail
Lead investorSoftBank Vision Fund 2 ($93M Series B)
Other backersAnimoca Brands (parent company), Galaxy Interactive, and other institutional investors
Brand/celebrity partnersSnoop Dogg, Adidas, Warner Music
AuditCertiK formal verification of SAND and LAND contracts; a separate source credits a high AA CertiK score

This is a genuinely deep, credible funding and partnership profile relative to most other games in this series, which makes the platform's still-alpha status a more notable finding, not a less notable one.

We don't just want to hand you our number; we want to show you how it sits next to what other review desks and comparison sites have published. We're flagging directly that most sources we found emphasize the funding and brand partnerships favorably without weighting the platform's still-alpha status or its two confirmed security incidents as heavily as our methodology does.

The Block Note (us)N/A / 100
Industry averageN/A / 100

Our score lands closely aligned with the aggregated industry average; most sources we found credit the same real funding depth, audit credentials, and brand partnerships we weighted favorably, while giving somewhat less emphasis to the "perpetual alpha" characterization we found directly relevant to Gameplay & Content Depth.

SourceScoreType

Scores compiled by our editorial team from publicly available reviews as of August 2026. "Editorial estimate" means the outlet didn't publish a single numeric score, so we converted their published verdict and sentiment into a comparable 100-point figure. Verify current figures directly with each source before citing them elsewhere.

Two confirmed incidents: a March 2023 employee-computer compromise that led to a phishing email campaign (limited to exposing user email addresses), and an August 2026 cross-chain bridge exploit on Base and BNB Smart Chain that let an attacker create unbacked SAND, disclosed as affecting under 0.01% of total supply with Ethereum and Polygon unaffected.

That figure refers to newly-created, illegitimate SAND tokens minted on the affected side-chains (Base and BNB Smart Chain) during the August 2026 bridge exploit, not real economic value stolen. The Sandbox's own disclosed assessment states the real impact was under 0.01% of total supply.

SAND peaked at roughly $8.40 in November 2021 and has fallen over 95% since. LAND floor prices have separately collapsed over 90% from their own peak.

Yes, per a detailed source, the platform "remains in perpetual alpha/beta with modest concurrent users" as of 2026, operating through seasonal events rather than a persistent, always-on open world.

Arthur Madrid (CEO) and Sebastien Borget (COO), both co-founders of Pixowl, which originally built The Sandbox as a mobile game in 2012 before Animoca Brands acquired it in 2018 and pivoted it toward blockchain.

At least $93 million in a Series B led by SoftBank Vision Fund 2, alongside Animoca Brands, Galaxy Interactive, and other institutional backers, described directly as the best-funded metaverse project in crypto gaming.

Yes. CertiK formally verified The Sandbox's SAND and LAND token contracts as structurally sound, and a separate technical source credits the project with a high AA CertiK score.

VoxEdit lets creators design 3D voxel assets with no coding required, and Game Maker lets them build playable experiences, both of which can be placed on owned LAND parcels across the platform's 166,464-parcel map.

Affiliate & editorial disclosure: This page may contain affiliate links. If you buy through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. That relationship does not influence the category weightings or scores above; those are set by our editorial methodology before any offer is placed. P2E crypto games carry real, structural risk regardless of which platform you use: token prices can collapse well below their launch valuation, reported volume and player-count figures are often self-reported or third-party-aggregated and can be difficult to verify independently, and NFT-based in-game assets can lose most of their value even if the underlying game continues operating normally. Nothing here is financial advice.
Features, pricing, and security details verified against public sources as of Aug 2026; always confirm current terms directly with The Sandbox.

More Reviews