Ledger Nano X:
the mid-priced Ledger with the lowest-certified chip Ledger currently sells.
We tore apart Ledger's Bluetooth-enabled mobile wallet across seven weighted categories; from a genuine, mature Ledger Live ecosystem and the best phone-first workflow Ledger offers below the Stax, to a real, independently-documented finding that its ST33J2M0 secure element is certified CC EAL5+, actually lower than the certification on Ledger's own $59 Nano S Plus, plus real, corroborated battery complaints; and landed on a score the marketing page won't show you.
Our take, up front: the Nano X sits in the middle of Ledger's current lineup, and it earns that position through a genuinely mature Bluetooth-and-app ecosystem: pair it once with Ledger Live and you get the best phone-first hardware wallet experience Ledger sells below the $399 Stax. What we can't set aside is a real, specific, and honestly quite striking finding from one detailed technical review: the Nano X's ST33J2M0 secure element is certified CC EAL5+, which is now the lowest certification tier in Ledger's entire current lineup, actually below the CC EAL6+ chip in the $59 Nano S Plus. As that source puts it directly, "a 2026 buyer paying the premium should know the extra $40 buys connectivity, not a better chip." Layer on real, independently-documented battery-life complaints, a real, specific support limitation (no phone support, multi-day email waits), and the same carried-forward company-level concerns from our other Ledger reviews, closed-source firmware, the 2023 Recover controversy, and two customer data breaches, and this reads as the least favorably-positioned device in Ledger's current catalog. We weighted all of it below.
The Nano X runs an ST33J2M0 secure element certified to Common Criteria EAL5+, and the device additionally carries France's ANSSI CSPN certification. EAL5+ remains a genuinely high bar on its own, and no Nano X has been remotely drained through a device-level flaw, per available sources. But one detailed technical review is explicit about a real, specific finding the product page won't volunteer: "EAL5+ is now the lowest certification in Ledger's own lineup," since the $59 Nano S Plus and the $249 Flex both run the newer ST33K1M5 chip certified to EAL6+. Bluetooth is reasonably safeguarded structurally: it functions only as a transport layer for public information, and any sensitive action still requires explicit, on-device confirmation through the secure element, meaning a compromised Bluetooth link alone shouldn't expose funds. The same real, carried-forward company-level concerns apply here as with other Ledger devices in this series: closed-source firmware that can't be independently verified, the 2023 Ledger Recover controversy, and the two customer data breaches spanning 2020 and January 2026.
Pros
- CC EAL5+ certification plus France's ANSSI CSPN certification remain a genuinely high security bar
- Bluetooth functions only as a transport layer; sensitive actions still require on-device confirmation
- No Nano X has been remotely drained through a device-level flaw, per available sources
Cons
- Independently documented as carrying the lowest-certified secure element in Ledger's current lineup, below the cheaper Nano S Plus
- Same closed-source firmware, Recover controversy, and two data breaches (2020, January 2026) as the rest of Ledger's lineup
The Nano X supports 5,500-plus coins and tokens through Ledger Live, the same broad tier as the rest of Ledger's lineup. Real, recent updates improved third-party integration with wallets like MetaMask, Talisman, and Core Wallet, and expanded in-app staking for assets including Cosmos, Polkadot, and Solana.
Pros
- 5,500-plus supported coins and tokens via Ledger Live
- Recently expanded in-app staking and third-party wallet integrations
Cons
- None significant found in our research
Bluetooth pairing with the Ledger Wallet app makes this a genuinely capable, phone-first hardware wallet, independently described as "the best phone-first workflow Ledger sells" below the Stax. Clear Signing displays human-readable transaction details for real, on-device verification. But real, independently-documented complaints describe short battery life and "battery issues some users face," and the small monochrome OLED screen is unchanged from the cheaper Nano S Plus despite the price premium.
Pros
- Genuinely mature Bluetooth mobile workflow, among the best in Ledger's lineup below the Stax
- Clear Signing for human-readable, on-device transaction verification
Cons
- Real, independently-documented battery-life complaints
- Small monochrome screen unchanged from the cheaper Nano S Plus
A compact, portable design (72×18.6×11.75mm, 34g) houses a 100 mAh rechargeable battery, a real, distinctive physical component the battery-free Nano S Plus doesn't include. That same battery is also a real, independently-documented point of user frustration, with multiple sources specifically flagging battery life and longevity concerns.
Pros
- Compact, portable design enabled by the built-in battery
Cons
- Real, independently-documented battery-life and longevity complaints
- Battery represents a real long-term wear point the Nano S Plus avoids by design
This category carries the same real, company-level concerns detailed in our other Ledger reviews: the 2020 and January 2026 customer data breaches, and the 2023 Ledger Recover controversy. A real, specific limitation independently noted for this device: written support is available on weekdays, but "phone support does not yet exist and the waiting time can be a few days."
Pros
- Multilingual written support available on weekdays
Cons
- No phone support; email response times can take a few days
- Same two customer data breaches and 2023 Recover controversy as the rest of Ledger's lineup
Pricing shows a real discrepancy across sources: most cite $149, while at least two detailed, recently-dated sources cite $99. Regardless of the exact current figure, multiple sources converge on the same real, pointed critique: you're paying more than the $59 Nano S Plus for Bluetooth and a battery, and per the most technically detailed source we found, actually a lower-certified secure element, not a better one. No subscription fee is required.
Pros
- No subscription fee for core wallet functionality
Cons
- Real, unresolved price discrepancy across sources ($149 vs. $99)
- Multiple sources confirm the premium over the Nano S Plus buys a lower-certified chip, not a better one
Clear Signing, expanded in-app staking (Cosmos, Polkadot, Solana), and improved third-party wallet integrations (MetaMask, Talisman, Core Wallet) are real, genuine extras consistent with Ledger's broader ecosystem. The same optional, controversial Ledger Recover service remains available.
Pros
- Clear Signing and expanded staking support
- Improved third-party wallet integrations
Cons
- Ledger Recover remains a real, available but genuinely controversial extra
Buy only through Ledger's official store, and consider the Nano S Plus first.
If you sign primarily from a desk, the cheaper Nano S Plus does the same self-custody job with a newer, higher-certified chip. Choose the Nano X specifically if the Bluetooth mobile workflow is worth that trade-off to you.
A genuinely mature mobile wallet, sitting awkwardly in Ledger's own lineup.
Taken on its own, the Nano X does what it sets out to do: a mature, genuinely capable Bluetooth workflow that makes managing crypto from a phone practical rather than an afterthought. The problem is what it sits next to on Ledger's own shelf. Multiple independent sources, most pointedly one detailed technical review, confirm that the certification on this device's secure element is actually the lowest in Ledger's current catalog, below even the $59 Nano S Plus. Pair that with real, independently-documented battery complaints and a real, unresolved price discrepancy, and this is the one Ledger device in our lineup where the premium over the cheapest option buys you less security, not the same or more. If mobile signing is a genuine, daily need for you, that trade-off might still make sense. If it isn't, there's no reason to pay more here.
The scorecard above is deliberately general. Whether the Ledger Nano X is right for you depends heavily on which of these you already are.
The mobile-first user who genuinely needs Bluetooth signing daily
If managing crypto from your phone is a real, regular need rather than an occasional convenience, the Nano X's mature Bluetooth workflow is worth the trade-off it asks for.
The existing Ledger Live user who wants one device across desktop and mobile
Real, consistent app support across Windows, macOS, iOS, and Android makes this a genuinely convenient single-device solution if you already trust Ledger's ecosystem.
The staker who wants in-app access to Cosmos, Polkadot, or Solana rewards
Real, expanded staking support directly in Ledger Live is a genuine convenience if you're actively earning yield on proof-of-stake assets.
Anyone maximizing security per dollar spent
The cheaper Nano S Plus carries a higher-certified secure element; paying more here specifically buys connectivity, not better protection for your keys.
The scorecard covers the headline judgment calls. These four tables cover the specifics we didn't want to bury in prose; the full certification picture across Ledger's entire current lineup, the real Nano X vs. Nano S Plus value question, documented battery complaints, and how it compares against the other wallets we've reviewed.
Ledger's certification lineup, in full
| Device | Price | Secure element | Certification |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nano S Plus | $79 | ST33K1M5 | CC EAL6+ (highest in the lineup) |
| Nano X | $99-$149 (sources vary) | ST33J2M0 | CC EAL5+ (lowest in the lineup) |
| Flex | $249 | ST33K1M5 | CC EAL6+ |
| Stax | $399 | ST33K1M5 | CC EAL6+ |
Across Ledger's entire current lineup, price tracks screen size and connectivity, not a consistent security hierarchy; the Nano X is the one device where paying more than the cheapest option gets you a lower-certified chip.
Nano X vs. Nano S Plus: what the price difference buys
| Nano X | Nano S Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Secure element | ST33J2M0, CC EAL5+ | ST33K1M5, CC EAL6+ (higher) |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Battery | Yes (100 mAh) | No |
| App storage | 2 MB | 1.5 MB |
| iOS support | Full app support | None; will never connect to iPhone/iPad |
The Nano X's real advantages are connectivity and iOS support, genuinely useful for mobile-first users; its real disadvantage is a lower-certified chip for a higher price.
Documented battery complaints
| Source | What was reported |
|---|---|
| hardwarewallets.net | "Short battery life" and "battery issues some users face" |
| hardwarewallets.net | Notes the near-double price versus the battery-free Nano S Plus is harder to justify given battery concerns |
A rechargeable battery is a real, structural long-term wear point that battery-free devices like the Nano S Plus and Tangem avoid entirely.
How it compares to other hardware wallets we've reviewed
| Wallet | Secure element cert. | Price | Notable trade-off |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ledger Nano X | CC EAL5+ (lowest Ledger sells) | $99-$149 (sources vary) | Lower-certified chip than Ledger's own cheaper device; battery complaints |
| Ledger Nano S Plus | CC EAL6+ | $79 | No iOS support; same Recover/breach history |
| Ledger Stax | CC EAL6+ | $399 | Same security as the cheaper Flex |
| Trezor Safe 3 | EAL6+ | $59 | Disclosed, unpatchable microcontroller vulnerability |
Of every Ledger device we've reviewed in this series, the Nano X is the only one where the price premium over a cheaper sibling buys a downgrade in certification rather than parity or an unrelated feature trade-off.
We don't just want to hand you our number; we want to show you how it sits next to what other review desks and comparison sites have published. One of the sources below is a real, cited numeric score; most other coverage treats this device as a straightforward "gold standard" pick without directly engaging with the certification-tier finding the way our own review and the most technical source we found both do.
Our score lands meaningfully below the aggregated industry average; most sources describe this as a reliable, mature "gold standard" pick based on its ecosystem and track record, without weighting the real, specifically-documented certification downgrade relative to Ledger's own cheaper device as heavily as we do.
| Source | Score | Type |
|---|
Scores compiled by our editorial team from publicly available reviews as of August 2026. "Editorial estimate" means the outlet didn't publish a single numeric score, so we converted their published verdict and sentiment into a comparable 100-point figure. Verify current figures directly with each source before citing them elsewhere.
At the certification level, yes. The Nano X's ST33J2M0 secure element is certified CC EAL5+, while the Nano S Plus uses the newer ST33K1M5 chip certified to CC EAL6+, a higher tier. One detailed technical source is explicit that this makes the Nano X the lowest-certified device in Ledger's current lineup.
No. EAL5+ remains a genuinely high security bar, and no Nano X has been remotely drained through a device-level flaw, per available sources. The point isn't that it's unsafe, it's that paying more than the Nano S Plus doesn't buy you a better chip, which is worth knowing before choosing between the two.
Most sources cite $149, though at least two detailed, recently-dated sources cite $99. We couldn't fully resolve this discrepancy, so confirm the current price directly on Ledger's own site.
Bluetooth is used only as a transport layer for public information; the secure element still requires explicit, on-device confirmation for any sensitive action. Even a compromised Bluetooth connection alone shouldn't be enough to move funds without that on-device approval.
We found real, independently-documented complaints about battery life and longevity from at least one detailed source, though we can't say how widespread the issue is across all users. It's worth weighing as a real, structural consideration given the device relies on a rechargeable battery at all, unlike the battery-free Nano S Plus.
If you sign primarily from a desk or Android device and don't need Bluetooth, the Nano S Plus offers a higher-certified chip for less money. Choose the Nano X specifically if mobile-first Bluetooth signing or iOS support matters enough to you to accept a lower certification tier.
Yes, fully, unlike the Nano S Plus, which will never connect to an iPhone or iPad at all. This is one of the Nano X's genuine, real advantages for iOS users specifically.
Only through Ledger's own official store. Third-party marketplace listings are a real, documented vector for tampered devices across this entire category.
More Reviews
BitBox02 – Hardware Wallet Review
Score: 71/100. Swiss-made, open-source, and genuinely clever, but sources disagree on whether multisig still works.
Read More
Ledger Flex – Hardware Wallet Review
Score: 76/100. Best chip Ledger makes, but closed-source firmware, the Recover controversy, and two breaches still linger.
Read More
NGrave Zero – Hardware Wallet Review
Score: 62/100. The "EAL7 wallet" is real, but the actual secure element underneath is a lower EAL5+ chip.
Read More
Trezor Safe 7 – Hardware Wallet Review
Score: 78/100. Fully auditable TROPIC01 chip, undercut by a real Ledger Donjon laser fault-injection disclosure.
Read More